Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2005, Qupperneq 153

Jökull - 01.01.2005, Qupperneq 153
George P.L. Walker of that kind in the world. The routine measurements of the samples, plus a number of smaller related stud- ies, took several years to complete. However, prelimi- nary results already published by Dagley et al. (1967), along with reliable radiometric dating in the following year, showed that the geomagnetic field had reversed its polarity at least 65 times in a period of some 11 million years. This important direct conclusion still stands, but has not been heeded by geomagnetists; they have since 1968 preferred basing their “polarity time scale” on interpretations of ocean-ridgemagnetic lineations, a very indirect procedure involving many assumptions. As a result, the number of geomagnetic reversals, at least during the last 15 M.y., has always been underestimated by a factor of two or more. Coming back to Walker’s profile drawings (Fig- ure 2), I have rarely received stratigraphic diagrams of this quality with comparable speed from other ge- ologists. One exception was John Preston (b. 1922) of Queen’s University of Belfast who carried out mapping of strata in the Arnarfjörður-Patreksfjörður area in 1970–1973. His previous research had in- cluded formations in Finland and Spitzbergen, but from around 1960 he also studied the Tertiary igneous rocks of Northern Ireland. Preston’s background was therefore quite similar to that of Walker; they were ac- quainted, and he later wrote review papers on the vol- canic geology of Northern Ireland covering Walker’s contributions (e.g. Preston, 1982). We met a few times in 1972–1973 and collaborated on a paper containing his valuable observations. He mentioned to me in a letter in 1971, that authorities in Iceland would not permit him to investigate the central volcano north of Arnarfjörður. I expect that the reason for their deci- sion was a desire to “preserve” such centers for future investigations by Icelandic scientists. As it happens, subsequent generations of geologists have not shown much interest in this or other extinct central volca- noes of Iceland: few detailed studies on them have been initiated since the mid-1970’s and almost none have been published. Only in the last few years has stratigraphic work been resumed in the region south of Arnarfjörður. 1978–1996 Walker (pers. comm., 1980) told me that he would have liked to have more time to prepare the mapping for the 1964–1965 expedition, and to revise it later in the light of the paleomagnetic results. The distances between successive profiles were in two cases more than 50 km, and in a few other cases of the order of 10 km. It turns out that magnetic polarities in pro- file segments that were supposed to overlap in age did not always agree. An attempt was made to re- sample the four profiles in Norðfjörður in the early 1990’s, in part by a French team and in part by a group including Walker, but the results from these efforts were reported in the literature to only a limited ex- tent (see Herrero-Bervera et al., 1999). The sampling of another composite section through Eastern Iceland employing additional methods such as Ar-Ar dating, geochemical and isotope analysis, may well be worth considering. Walker maintained an interest in investigations of lower crustal structure. Following my visit to him and paleomagnetists in Hawaii in 1989 (Fig- ure 4), he wrote to me on 13 July 1990 describing his ideas about those intrusive complexes which he termed high-intensity ones, i.e. with more than 40% content of dikes and sheets. Walker considered these to be an important component of the crust at central volcanoes, and even of oceanic areas in general. In SE-Iceland, he added, there were fine and very ac- cessible examples of intrusive complexes “just crying out to be studied by a whole range of techniques”. An accompanying map indicated favorable localities for such studies, including one exceptionally so in an unnamed tributary valley west of Kálfafellsdalur (64◦10’N, 16◦06’W). In areas where the basement consists of low-density rocks such as hyaloclastites and vesicular pahoehoe lavas, he expected that a co- herent complex might form close to the surface. I am not aware whether Walker or others did embark on a project to investigate Icelandic intrusive com- plexes in the way he envisaged, which would have required considerable expenditures on field and lab- oratory work. A final point in these disconnected reminiscences concerns a reprint I received from George Walker ten JÖKULL No. 55, 2005 153
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.