Læknablaðið

Árgangur

Læknablaðið - okt. 2019, Blaðsíða 25

Læknablaðið - okt. 2019, Blaðsíða 25
LÆKNAblaðið 2019/105 441 R A N N S Ó K N Introduction: Many factors influence the nursing needs and survival of nursing home residents, including the admission criteria. The aim of the study was to compare health, survival and predictors for one- and two-year survival of people entering Icelandic nursing homes between 2003–2007 and 2008–2014. Material and methods: Retrospective, descriptive, comparative study. The data was obtained from a Directorate of Health database for all interRAI assessments of Icelandic nursing homes from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014 (N = 8487). Results: There was a significant difference in the health and survival of new nursing home residents before and after December 31, 2007. In the latter period, the mean age was 82.7 years. In the previous period, it was 82.1 years, and the prevalence of Alzheimer‘s disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and COPD increased between the periods. One-year survival decreased from 73.4% to 66.5%, and two-year survival decreased from 56.9% to 49.1%. The strongest mortality risk factors were heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as high scores on the CHESS scale and ADL long scale. Conclusion: After 2007, new residents were older, in poorer health, and their life expectancy was shorter than for those moving to nursing homes before that. The results suggest that the aim of the regulatory change was achieved, i.e., to prioritise those in worst health. Their care needs may therefore be different and greater than before. Health and survival in Icelandic nursing homes 2003 – 2014, before and after the setting of stricter criteria for nursing home admission in December 2007 ENGLISH SUMMARY 1Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, 2Emergency, Geriatrics, Rehabilitation Services, National University Hospital, 3School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Akureyri, 4Department of Education and Science, Akureyri Hospital, 5Department of Rehabilitation, Akureyri Hospital, 6Respiratory-, allergy- and sleep research, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Sweden. Key words: Geriatrics, Minimum Data Set, nursing homes, old people, elderly people, survival. Correspondence: Ingibjörg Hjaltadóttir, ingihj@hi.is Greinin barst til blaðsins 8. maí 2019, samþykkt til birtingar 27. ágúst 2019. Ingibjörg Hjaltadóttir1,2 Kjartan Ólafsson3 Árún K. Sigurðardóttir4,5 Ragnheiður Harpa Arnardóttir4,6,7 12. Mor V, Intrator O, Unruh MA, Cai S. Temporal and geographic variation in the validity and internal consistency of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set 2.0. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 78. 13. Fries BE, Simon SE, Morris JN, Flodstrom C, Bookstein FL. Pain in US nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. Gerontologist 2001; 41: 173­9. 14. Burrows AB, Morris JN, Simon SE, Hirdes JP, Phillips C. Development of a minimum data set­based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 165­72. 15. Gruber­Baldini AL, Zimmerman SI, Mortimore E, Magaziner J. The validity of the minimum data set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1601­6. 16. Resnick HE, Fries BE, Verbrugge LM. Windows to their world: the effect of sensory impairments on social engagement and activity time in nursing home residents. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997; 52: S135­S44. 17. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010­2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 2013; 80: 1778­83. 18. Ogarek JA, McCreedy EM, Thomas KS, Teno JM, Gozalo PL. Minimum Data Set Changes in Health, End­Stage Disease and Symptoms and Signs Scale: A Revised Measure to Predict Mortality in Nursing Home Residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66: 976­81. 19. Foebel AD, Liperoti R, Gambassi G, Gindin J, Ben Israel J, Bernabei R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cardiovascular medication use among nursing home residents with ischemic heart disease: results from the SHELTER study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15: 410­5. 20. Zarowitz BJ, O’Shea T. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment in nursing home residents with cognitive impa­ irment. J Manag Care Pharm 2012; 18: 598­606. 21. Hjaltadóttir I, Sigurðardóttir Á. Algengi sykursýki og heilsufar íbúa á íslenskum hjúkrunarheimilum 2003­2012. Læknablaðið 2015; 101: 79­84. 22. Garcia TJ, Brown SA. Diabetes management in the nursing home. Diabetes Educ 2011; 37: 167­87. 23. Vetrano DL, Collamati A, Magnavita N, Sowa A, Topinkova E, Finne­Soveri H, et al. Health determinants and survival in nursing home residents in Europe: Results from the SHELTER study. Maturitas 2018; 107: 19­25. 24. Samefors M, Östgren CJ, Mölstad S, Lannering C, Midlöv P, Tengblad A. Vitamin D deficiency in elderly people in Swedish nursing homes is associated with increased mortality. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 170: 667­75. 25. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 633­44. 26. Haugstvedt A, Graue M, Aarflot M, et al. Challenges in maintaining satisfactory documentation routines and evidence­based diabetes management in nursing homes. Int Diabet Nurs 2016; 13: 37­42. 27. Vossius C, Selbæk G, Benth JŠ, Bergh S. Mortality in nursing home residents: A longitudinal study over three years. PloS one 2018; 13: e0203480. 28. Jónsson Á, Bernhöft I, Bernhardsson K, Jónsson PV. Afturvirk rannsókn á heilsufarsbreytum heimilismanna á Droplaugarstöðum árin 1983­2002. Læknablaðið 2005; 91: 153­60. 29. Eiríksdóttir JÓ, Bragadóttir H, Hjaltadóttir I. Samanburður á heilsufari, færni, einkennum og meðferðarmarkmiðum íbúa á íslenskum hjúkrunarheimilum eftir áætluðum lífslíkum. Tímarit hjúkrunarfræðinga 2017; 93: 79­85. 30. Shin JH, Scherer Y. Advantages and disadvantages of using MDS data in nursing research. J Gerontol Nurs 2009; 35: 7­17. DOI: 10.17992/lbl.2019.10.251
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56

x

Læknablaðið

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.