Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 165

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 165
SKÓGRÆKT HANDAN SKÓGARMARKA / NSSE ANDERS BRYN, ANN NORDERHAUG, AND KAROLINE DAUGSTAD Re-growth effects on vascular plant richness in Norwegian, abandoned summer farm areas SAMANTEKT Svæði á mörkum fjalllendis og Iáglendis eru mikiivæg fyrir afkomu landbúnaðarvistkerfa á Norðurlöndum með því að veita bændum og búfé þeirra líffræðileg gæði. í þessari rannsókn á sumarbýlaþyrping- um á mörkum fjalllendis og Iáglendis sem eiga 4-5000 ára landnýt- ingarsögu var könnuð tegundafjölbreytni háplantna eftir að býlin höfðu verið yfirgefin. Þrjú framvindusvæði voru skilgreind, kortlögð með GIS og notuð sem einingar í grasafræðilegar kannanir. Það kom í Ijós að skráð áhrif endurvaxtar á fjölbreytileika plantna voru háð því hvaða rúmlægi kvarði var notaður, og að tegundafjölbreytni plantna jókst yfir lengra tímabil. Þegar endurvöxtur landslags á sumarbýlum heldur áfram, rýrnar bæði líffræðilegt og menningarlegt gildi þeirra. I tengslum við aukna plöntun trjáa á íslandi gæti átt sér stað sams- konarrýrnun á Iíffræðilegum fjölbreytileika. Since the Iron Age and up to this century summer farming has been an important and integrat- ed part of Norwegian husbandry (Kvamme and Norderhaug 1999). The summer farm system was based on the need to utilize the resources of the outfields. The mountain summer farms had three main functions: (i) To pro- vide summer pastures for the animals in the outfields near the summer farm, (ii) to be a produc- tion place for milk and milk- products, (iii) to serve as a base for collection of winter fodder. Norwegian summer farming had its golden period in the mid- dle of the 19th century, and in 1850 about 53 000 Norwegian farmsteads had summer farms in use (Reinton 1961). The number, however, decreased towards the end of the century, and this pro- cess has continued throughout the 20th century. In 1999 only 1738 summer farms were in use (Statens Kornforretning 2000). Grazing by different domestic animals affected large areas and formed the summer farm land- scape in combination with mow- ing of in-fenced areas, forests and mires, collection of various other types of fodder (branches, leaves, lichen, etc.) and forest logging. The decrease in summer farm- ing has permitted a large-scale re-growth and secondary succes- sion of mountain birch forests in Norway (Aas and Faarlund 1995, Austrheim 1998, Daugstad 2000). The consequences of this re- growth for the summer farm landscape and vascular plant species richness, exemplified with results from a study in Grimsdalen, southeast Norway, is discussed in this paper. Study area and methods In Grimsdalen, Dovre municipali- ty, summer farming is a more than 400 years old tradition. In the 1930s the utilisation period at the summer farms, however, decreased by three months, and from the 60s until the 80s the summer farms were abandoned, except for three summer farms still in use. The ceasing of felling and mowing, and reduction in grazing have resulted in a large- scale re-growth of birch forest. The investigated plots present- ed in this paper, is situated around three abandoned clusters of summer farms. They are locat- ed on basic rocks (Pedersen 1979) and all sites are south-exposed and situated between 940 and 1060 meter above sea level. Average temperature during the three warmest months is 9°C, e.g. well below the potential sub- alpine birch forest limit in this area and just above the potential Scots pine forest limit (Moen 1998). The annual precipitation amounts 430 to 550 millimeters, most of it as summer rain. SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 I.tbl. 163
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.