Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 165

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 165
SKÓGRÆKT HANDAN SKÓGARMARKA / NSSE ANDERS BRYN, ANN NORDERHAUG, AND KAROLINE DAUGSTAD Re-growth effects on vascular plant richness in Norwegian, abandoned summer farm areas SAMANTEKT Svæði á mörkum fjalllendis og Iáglendis eru mikiivæg fyrir afkomu landbúnaðarvistkerfa á Norðurlöndum með því að veita bændum og búfé þeirra líffræðileg gæði. í þessari rannsókn á sumarbýlaþyrping- um á mörkum fjalllendis og Iáglendis sem eiga 4-5000 ára landnýt- ingarsögu var könnuð tegundafjölbreytni háplantna eftir að býlin höfðu verið yfirgefin. Þrjú framvindusvæði voru skilgreind, kortlögð með GIS og notuð sem einingar í grasafræðilegar kannanir. Það kom í Ijós að skráð áhrif endurvaxtar á fjölbreytileika plantna voru háð því hvaða rúmlægi kvarði var notaður, og að tegundafjölbreytni plantna jókst yfir lengra tímabil. Þegar endurvöxtur landslags á sumarbýlum heldur áfram, rýrnar bæði líffræðilegt og menningarlegt gildi þeirra. I tengslum við aukna plöntun trjáa á íslandi gæti átt sér stað sams- konarrýrnun á Iíffræðilegum fjölbreytileika. Since the Iron Age and up to this century summer farming has been an important and integrat- ed part of Norwegian husbandry (Kvamme and Norderhaug 1999). The summer farm system was based on the need to utilize the resources of the outfields. The mountain summer farms had three main functions: (i) To pro- vide summer pastures for the animals in the outfields near the summer farm, (ii) to be a produc- tion place for milk and milk- products, (iii) to serve as a base for collection of winter fodder. Norwegian summer farming had its golden period in the mid- dle of the 19th century, and in 1850 about 53 000 Norwegian farmsteads had summer farms in use (Reinton 1961). The number, however, decreased towards the end of the century, and this pro- cess has continued throughout the 20th century. In 1999 only 1738 summer farms were in use (Statens Kornforretning 2000). Grazing by different domestic animals affected large areas and formed the summer farm land- scape in combination with mow- ing of in-fenced areas, forests and mires, collection of various other types of fodder (branches, leaves, lichen, etc.) and forest logging. The decrease in summer farm- ing has permitted a large-scale re-growth and secondary succes- sion of mountain birch forests in Norway (Aas and Faarlund 1995, Austrheim 1998, Daugstad 2000). The consequences of this re- growth for the summer farm landscape and vascular plant species richness, exemplified with results from a study in Grimsdalen, southeast Norway, is discussed in this paper. Study area and methods In Grimsdalen, Dovre municipali- ty, summer farming is a more than 400 years old tradition. In the 1930s the utilisation period at the summer farms, however, decreased by three months, and from the 60s until the 80s the summer farms were abandoned, except for three summer farms still in use. The ceasing of felling and mowing, and reduction in grazing have resulted in a large- scale re-growth of birch forest. The investigated plots present- ed in this paper, is situated around three abandoned clusters of summer farms. They are locat- ed on basic rocks (Pedersen 1979) and all sites are south-exposed and situated between 940 and 1060 meter above sea level. Average temperature during the three warmest months is 9°C, e.g. well below the potential sub- alpine birch forest limit in this area and just above the potential Scots pine forest limit (Moen 1998). The annual precipitation amounts 430 to 550 millimeters, most of it as summer rain. SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 I.tbl. 163
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.