Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 183

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 183
Fig. 1 the quality of seeds in the seed rain affects the success of the par- ticular year's seed rain in seedling recruitment. Seeds should also drop on suitable microsites for seed germination and seedling recruitment, which does not nec- essarily happen (Schupp 1995). A soil seed bank is the product of a seed rain of many years, even decades. The seeds accu- mulating in the seed bank have several alternative fates (Simp- son et al. 1989). Some of them may germinate, or some may lose their viability because of physiological death or patho- gens. Some of them can be eaten by predators or become buried in deep layers of the soil. Rabino- wich and Rapp (1980) and Schott and Hamburg (1997) recorded a reduction in the seed number from the seed rain to the seed bank of prairie and old field veg- etation. This pattern reflects an effective eradication of the seed bank via seed germination and death. In an alpine undisturbed heath the seed bank (germinated in a green house) and the seed rain are dense. However, en- vironmental conditions almost completely prevent seedling emergence from the seed bank in the field (Welling and Laine a, in prep.). On the other hand, in an alpine meadow, seedling emer- gence from the seed bank in the field is effective. Drought and low temperatures limit seed germination, and therefore affect seedling recruit- ment from the seed bank. On the other hand, needle ice activity and soil drought are important constraints on seedling survival. Disturbed, open patches facili- tate seed germination and seed- ling survival. This is because dis- turbances decrease competition by destroying vegetation and providing better light, tempera- ture and nutrient conditions for the seedlings (Chambers 1995). Surprisingly, comparable seed- ling emergence was found in gaps and closed vegetation of an alpine meadow and heath (Welling and Laine a, in prep.). In the meadow, a shift in the domi- nant seedling flora from gaps to closed vegetation seems to be a reason for the comparable seed- ling emergence in these patches. In the heath, probably drought' prevents seedling emergence in gaps as effectively as the thick moss cover in closed vegetation. Several plant traits, for in- stance diaspore morphology, seed size, state of clonality and growth form, have a role in the success of plants during the regeneration pathway. The con- sequences of seed size - small or large - are apparent in regenera- tion. Small seeds dominate the seed rain (Chambers 1993, Welling and Laine b, in prep.) and the seed bank (Chambers 1993, Thompson et al. 1998). On the other hand, a large seed is an advantage in colonization, espe- cially that of closed vegetation (Kiviniemi 1999). Appendaged diaspores have an ability to dis- perse longer distances than non- appendaged diaspores, but ap- pendages may limit burial in the soil (Rabinowich 1981). The dias- pores which are not buried are exposed to predation, heat and drought. Thus, appendiges may limit seedling emergence and recruitment. Many herbs and sedges are known to demand light for seed germination, but grasses are tol- erant to shade (Grime et al. 1987, Chambers 1987, Schutzand Rave 1999). Herbs and sedges should therefore demand gaps for seed germination. On the other hand, grasses should germinate in closed vegetation effectively. However, narrow leaves may limit seedling recruitment of grasses in closed vegetation. In clonal plants seedlings are com- monly rare (Eriksson 1992). Clonal plants are abundant in standing vegetation, however, because of their large size and effective vegetative spreading. In all, particular plant traits go SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl. 181
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.