Læknablaðið

Årgang

Læknablaðið - 15.04.2000, Side 20

Læknablaðið - 15.04.2000, Side 20
FRÆÐIGREINAR / KRANSÆÐAVÍKKANIR Á ÍSLANDI Lokaorð Próun kransæðavíkkunaraðgerða hefur verið bylt- ingarkennd undanfarna tvo áratugi. Tíðni þessara aðgerða hérlendis er há miðað við fólksfjölda, árang- ur hefur verið góður og jafnan kappkostað að taka nýjungar í tækni og lyfjameðferð í notkun þegar þær hafa sannað sig í erlendum rannsóknum. Kransæða- víkkanir eru sérhæfðar hátækniaðgerðir sem eiga eft- ir að þróast enn frekar á næstu öld. Aukin tækni, reynsla og framfarir í meðferð hafa orðið til þess að sá sjúklingahópur sem gagn hefur af kransæðavíkkun fer ört vaxandi. Mikilvægt er að búið sé vel að þessari meðferð hér á landi og vinnubrögð samhæfð. Heimildir 1. Gríientzig AR. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis [letter to editor]. Lancet 1978; 1:263. 2. Myler RK, Stertzer SH. Coronary and peripheral angioplasty: historical perspective. In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of interventio- nal cardiology. London: WB Saunders Company; 1990:187-98. 3. Altmann DB, Racz M, Battleman DS, Bergman G, Spokojny A, Hannan EL, et al. Reduction in angioplasty complications after the introduction of coronary stents: results from a conse- cutive series of 2242 patients. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 503-7. 4. Eeckhout E, Wijns W, Meier B, Goy JJ. Indications for intra- coronary stent placement: the European view. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1014-9. 5. Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, Withlow PL, Hofling B, Sim- onton CA, et al. A comparison of direct atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 221-7. 6. Baim DS, Cutlip DE, Sharma SK, Ho KK, Fortuna R, Schreiber TL, et al. Final results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT) [see comments]. Circulation 1998; 97:322-31. 7. Kini A, Marmur JD, Duvvuri S, Dangas G, Choudhary S, Sharma S. Rotational atherectomy: improved procedural out- come with evolution of technique and equipment. Single- center results of first 1,000 patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Inter- vent 1999; 46:305-11. 8. Stone GW, de Marchena E, Dageforde D, Foschi A, Muhle- stein JB, Mclvor M, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicen- ter comparison of laser facilitated balloon angioplasty versus stand-alone balloon angioplasty in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. The Laser Angioplasty Versus Angio- plasty (LAVA) Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 1714-21. 9. Safian RD, Freed M. Overview of interventional devices. In: Freed M, Grines C, Safian RD, eds. The new Manual of Interventional Cardiology. Birmingham, Michigan: Physici- ans’ Press; 1996:195-215. 10. Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, Heyndrickx G, Lablanche JM, Morice MC, et al. Interventional Cardiology in Europe 1995. Eur Heart J 1999 20:484-95. 11. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp J, Nanchahal K, Sculpher MJ, Buxton MJ. Long-term results of RITA-I trial: clinical and cost comparison of coronary angioplasty on coronary bypass surgery grafting. Randomised Intervention for Treatment of Angina. Lancet 1998; 352:1419-25. 12. The BARI Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:217-25. 13. Stein B, Weintraub WS, Gebhart SP, Cohen-Bernstein CL, Grosswald R, Liberman HA, et al. Influence of diabetes mell- itus on early and late outcome after percutaneous translum- inal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995; 91:979-89. 14. Kurbaan AS, Bowker TJ, Ilsley CD, Rickards AF. Impact of postangioplasty restenosis on comparison of outcome between angioplasty and bypass grafting: CABRI investigators. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 272-6. 15. DeFeyter PJ. Lipids and coronary restenosis: an elusive link [editorial]. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1371-4. 16. Van den Brand MJBM, Nreeman A, Rensing B, Boersma E, van den Heuvel P, Penn I, et al. Comparison of the extent of revascularization and event free survival in the angioplasty arms of two randomized trials of coronary angioplasty versus surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease [abstract]. Eur HeartJ 1999; 20/Suppl.: 153. 17. Van Belle E, Bauters C, Hubert E, Bodrt JC, Abolmaalik K, Meurice T, et al. Restenosis rates in diabetic patients.a com- parison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels [see comments]. Circulation 1997; 96:1454-60. 18. Kornowski R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Bucher TA, et al. Increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus after coronary interventions is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circula- tion 1997; 95:1366-9. 19. Gum PA, O’Keefe JH, Jr., Borkon AM, Spertus JA, Bateman TM, McGraw JP, et al. Bypass surgery versus coronary angio- plasty for revascularization of treated diabetic patients. Circu- lation 1997; 96/Suppl. 9:11-7-10. 20. The TIMI IIIB Investigators. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-Wave myocardial infarction: Results of the TIMIIIIB trial. Circulation 1994; 89: 1545-56. 21. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Crawford MH, Blaustein AS, Deedwania PC, Zoble RG, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators [see com- ments]. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1785-92. 22. FRISC II Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II pro- spective randomised multicentre study. Lancet 1999; 354: 708- 15. 23. Michels KB, Yusuf S. Does PTCA in acute myocardial infarc- tion affect mortality and reinfarction rates? A quantitative overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized clinical trials. Circulation 1995; 91:476-85. 24. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO Ilb) Angio- plasty Substudy Investigators [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1997; 337:287] [see comments]. N Engl J Med 336: 1621-8. 25. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JCA, de Boer M-J, Reiffers S, Miedema K, Ottervanger JP, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angio- plasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myo- cardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1413-9. 26. Guðnason Þ, Þorgeirsson G, Eyjólfsson K, Jónmundsson EH. Tafarlaus kransæðavíkkun. Nýjung í meðferð bráðrar krans- æðastíflu á íslandi. Læknablaðið 1996; 82: 269-75. 27. van’t Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with early, intermediate and late reperfusion therapy by pri- mary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur HeartJ 1998; 19:118-23. 28. Garot J, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Monin JL, Du Pouy P, Bourachot ML, Teiger E, et al. Effect of delayed percutaneous translu- minal coronary angioplasty of occluded coronary arteries after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 915-21. 29. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, Costantini C, Morice MC, St. Goar FG, et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) stent pilot trial. Circulation 1999; 99:1548-54. 30. Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JE, Katz S, George BS, Jones AA, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. ReoPro and Primary PTCA Org- anization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators. Circulation 1998; 98: 734-41. 31. Zeymer U, Neuhaus K-L. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Curr Opin Cardiol 1999; 14: 392-402. 32. Popma JJ, Piana RN, Prpic R. Clinical trials in interventional cardiology. Curr Opin Cardiol 1999; 14: 412-8. 33. Stone GW. CADILLAC trial. Plenary Session XII. Late- breaking clinical trials. Presented at the American Heart Association 72nd Scientific Sessions, November 7-10, 1999, http://www.medscape.com 34. Maier W, Enderlin MF, Bonzel T, Danchin N, Heyndrickx G, Míihlberger V, et al. Audit and quality control in angioplasty in Europe: procedureal results of the AQUA Study 1997. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1261-70. 35. Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, Franzen D, Rupprecht HJ, Henblein B, et al. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angio- plasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1672-8. 36. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, Trapani 248 Læknablaðið 2000/86
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108

x

Læknablaðið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.