Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2005, Qupperneq 83

Jökull - 01.01.2005, Qupperneq 83
A late Holocene jökulhlaup, Markarfljót, Iceland: nature and impacts abandoned flood channels and back into the gorge further downstream. As it reached the Markarfljót sandur, at the end of the gorge system by Þórsmörk, the flow was focussed in the centre of the valley, not spreading out to the low slopes along the valley mar- gins at Langanes or the northern Markarfljót banks. This flood became channelled as it reached Fljótshlíð, with tephra-rich flows following the general line of the Þverá, swamping the trees at Drumbabót. It seems likely that over Landeyjar the flow was confined to the main river channels and if any flow extended over the wider areas it was at a lower velocity, mainly wa- ter, carrying only finer sediment. Haraldsson (1981; 43) gives a maximum age of 1350±65 14C yr BP (U- 4298, 1390–1130 cal BP) close to river channels in Landeyjar which may have been deposited by over- bank flow or wind displacement of fine material from channel deposits. This date compares well with the Drumbabót tree date presented here (1230±35 14C yr BP, AA-48027, 1270–1060 cal BP, Smith 2004) and suggests that both of these deposits may have been emplaced during the same flood event. IMPLICATIONS Consideration of the Drumbabót story presents impli- cations for understanding the environmental impact of medium/small scale flood events and the scale of floods reflected in the Holocene sedimentary record. This flood at 1230±35 14C yr BP (Smith 2004) deposited multiple metres of flood sediment within the channel of the Þverá covering much of the sandur area with a thin coating of silt and sand. Woodland was swamped and killed and there is no evidence of reestablishment of similar mature woods. Recovery of vegetation on mudflow and pyroclastic surfaces is related to substrate stability, presence of sufficient or- ganic content and nutrients in the sediment and avail- ability of soil moisture in the period of seedling es- tablishment (Frenzen et al. 1986). Although the main tephra-rich sand and gravel deposits would be free- draining and less suitable for colonisation, silt-rich low-flow or windblown deposits outside of the main channels may have been nutrient rich and thus have rapidly become revegetated and stable. Despite causing a major influx of sediment into the drainage network of the lowlands the Drumba- bót c. 1230 14C yr BP flood did not cause any ma- jor channel changes. Major changes in the drainage pattern in the lower part of the region did not occur until 500 years later, around 1200 AD (Haraldsson 1981). Then, probably in a single event, the exist- ing pattern with numerous (at least seven) relatively small courses on the plain was abruptly changedwhen all courses were combined in a single channel on the eastern part, and peat deposition started in the aban- doned courses. The cause of this event is unknown, but may be related to a climate change and increased glaciofluvial activity. So far no sedimentary or his- torical records have been found for a volcanogenic jökulhlaup at this time. The majority of the Holocene floods identified in the Markarfljót valley left traces of sediment along the valley margins, filled the approximately 5 km wide valley in the sandur area and filled and over- topped the gorge upstream (Smith 2004, Larsen et al. 2005). Gröndal et al. (2005) state that such floods had a discharge, if water-dominated, of over around 100–300,000 m3/sec. Since the Drumbabót flood has mainly been identified based on evidence found in the sandur area and did not seem to extend so far up the valley sides we infer that it was significantly smaller than other floods recorded (less than 100,000 m3/sec if expressed in the same terms), and has only been recognised because it is a relatively recent event. Such medium and small scale events are not repre- sented in the older Holocene sedimentary records, since their deposits have either been scoured away or buried by subsequent fluvial and flood activity. This lack of evidence however cannot be interpreted as a lack of jökulhlaup activity in the Markarfljót between the biggest Holocene events, meaning that frequen- cies calculated based on sedimentary records must be understood as minimum estimates only. As can be seen from the Drumbabót story presented here, even smaller scale flood events have overtopped the gorge, washed over the banks of the main river channels on Landeyjar and been catastrophic enough to destroy an entire mature birch wood. Indeed, neither Haraldsson (1981, 40; 1993) nor Påhlsson (1981; 60) found any signs of organic deposits older than around 2000 14C JÖKULL No. 55 83
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.