Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2016, Qupperneq 1

Jökull - 01.01.2016, Qupperneq 1
Reviewed research article The subglacial topography of Drangajökull ice cap, NW-Iceland, deduced from dense RES-profiling Eyjólfur Magnússon1, Joaquín M. C. Belart1, Finnur Pálsson1, Leif S. Anderson1, Ágúst Þ. Gunnlaugsson1, Etienne Berthier2, Hálfdán Ágústsson3 and Áslaug Geirsdóttir1 1Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Askja, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland 2Laboratoire d’Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (LEGOS – CNRS), Université de Toulouse, France 3Icelandic Meteorological Office, Bústaðavegi 9, 150 Reykjavík, Iceland Correspondence to: eyjolfm@hi.is Abstract — Systematic mapping of the bedrock beneath the Icelandic ice caps began in 1980. We continue this effort by presenting a detailed bedrock digital elevation model (DEM) of Drangajökull ice cap in NW-Iceland, surveyed using radio echo sounding (RES) in March 2014. About 590 km of RES profiles, generally with 200– 300 m spacing, were surveyed. This is to date the densest set of RES profiles measured on an Icelandic ice cap. We describe the processing of the radar profiles and construction of the bedrock DEM. We also analyse possible errors of surveyed glacier thickness along the profiles and discuss the accuracy of the final bedrock DEM. The bedrock DEM reveals topography with the same general character as other areas of NW-Iceland (Vestfirðir). The new bedrock DEM and a series of surface DEMs allow estimates of total ice cap volume and relative volume change since the mid-20th century. The bedrock data combined with the most accurate available surface DEM of Drangajökull, from July 2011, reveals a total ice cap volume of 15.4±0.4 km3, of which ∼71% was stored on the west side of the ice cap. At that time the average thickness of Drangajökull was 107±3 m and the maximum observed thickness, found on Kaldalónsjökull outlet glacier, was 284±14 m. In 1946–2014, the total ice cap volume (in autumn) was reduced from ∼18 km3 to ∼15 km3. Approximately half of this volume was lost in 1994–2011. We describe and discuss several interesting phenomena revealed by the RES data and the derived bedrock DEM. The presented bedrock data also helps to explain curious surface features in the accumulation area of NE-Drangajökull. INTRODUCTION Well constrained glacier geometry is fundamental for most glaciological studies. Digital elevation models (DEMs) of surface and subglacial topography are nec- essary prerequisites for glacier modelling (e.g. Gillet- Chaulet et al., 2012; Aðalgeirsdóttir et al., 2011) and subglacial hydrology studies (e.g. Björnsson, 1988, Flowers, 2015). Glacier thickness also provides a measure of freshwater storage in glaciers, relevant re- garding use of glacier water for irrigation and electric power production (e.g. Radic and Hock, 2013) as well as to estimate the possible contribution of glacier melt to sea level rise (e.g. Vaughan et al., 2013). Various methods are available to accurately map the glacier surface, but glacier thickness and sub- glacial topography is typically constrained using radar, often referred to as radio echo sounding (RES). RES has been used to measure glacier thickness and map the bedrock of cold glaciers (ice temperature <0◦C) since the 1960s (Bailey et al., 1964; Robin et al., 1969; Gudmandsen, 1969). In the 1970s sci- JÖKULL No. 66, 2016 1
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.