Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2016, Qupperneq 2

Jökull - 01.01.2016, Qupperneq 2
Eyjólfur Magnússon et al. entists realised that by using radar with frequency in the range of a few MHz, temperate ice could be pen- etrated as well (Watts and England, 1975; Ferrari et al., 1976). Icelandic scientists became pioneers in the development of instruments to survey the thickness of temperate glaciers (Björnsson, 1977; Sverrisson et al., 1980). Since 1980, the Icelandic ice caps have been systematically surveyed with RES (e.g. Björnsson et al., 1987; Björnsson and Einarsson, 1990; Björns- son et al., 2000; Björnsson, 2009; Magnússon et al., 2012). The density of RES-measurements is often sparse, particularly for large ice caps and ice sheets (e.g. Bamber et al., 2013; Fretwell et al., 2013). The sur- veys are usually on profiles with sufficient resolution along profile but with considerable distance between the profiles. The profile density is improving rapidly due to better survey technology (both instruments and logistics) and various ongoing missions such as Ice- Bridge (e.g. Li et al., 2013). The under-sampling of topographic features with RES surveys is how- ever still a problem for most glaciers. The existing bedrock DEMs of all the large ice caps in Iceland are based on RES profiles, commonly with ∼1 km profile separation, often with significant gaps in inaccessible crevassed areas. In an attempt to construct realistic bedrock DEMs from the under-sampled data set, the DEMs have been created from manually drawn con- tour lines using the a prior knowledge of likely land- scape in volcanic regions eroded by glaciers. This method avoids many artefacts created by directly ap- plying interpolation algorithms. The under-sampling is however the largest source of elevation error in the bedrock DEMs. In this study we present the first subglacial topog- raphy and glacier thickness maps of Drangajökull ice cap. The survey and data post-processing were im- plemented to extract more bedrock details than previ- ously attempted for Icelandic ice caps. Typical sepa- ration between RES profiles was 200–300 m revealing the landscape beneath the glacier in unusually high detail. We describe the data processing, the construc- tion of the bedrock DEM and associated uncertainties. We extract key dimensions of the ice cap and indi- vidual ice catchments, including mean and maximum thickness as well as the net ice cap volume. The net volume of Drangajökull and how it has evolved since 1946 is derived using the new bedrock map and avail- able surface DEMs (Magnússon et al., 2016). The water catchments of rivers, draining meltwater from the ice cap, are delineated. We also discuss some unique features of Drangajökull ice cap, which the bedrock mapping either reveals or helps explain. STUDY AREA Drangajökull ice cap, the fifth largest ice cap in Ice- land, covered 144 km2 in 2011 (Magnússon et al., 2016). It is located in NW-Iceland (Figure 1), where the snow line altitude is lowest in Iceland; almost the entire ice cap is currently at altitude below 900 m a.s.l. The frontal locations of three outlet glaciers of Drangajökull, Kaldalónsjökull, Leirufjarðarjökull and Reykjarfjarðarjökull have been monitored an- nually since 1931 (Sigurðsson, 1998; http://sporda- kost.jorfi.is/). These records have shown retreat in- terrupted with periods of advances during surges; the three outlets are all surge type glaciers (Björnsson et al., 2003; Brynjólfsson et al., 2015). Despite this early effort, which is ongoing (Einarsson and Sigurðs- son, 2015), Drangajökull was until recently among the least studied ice caps in Iceland. This has changed in recent years, starting with annual monitoring of the mass balance at selected profiles on Leirufjarðarjökull and SW-Drangajökull in 2005 (Sigurðsson, 2006) and RES glacier thickness measurements at a few sites (point surveys) (Magnússon et al., 2004). The surface was mapped in high resolution with laser scanning (Lidar) from an airplane 20 July 2011 (Jóhannesson et al., 2013). Various studies have been carried out in this area to construct the past glaciation history of Drangajökull using landforms in the periph- ery of the ice cap and lake sediment cores. These studies have focused on advances during surges in the past 300 years (Brynjólfsson et al., 2015), glacial ex- tent during the Holocene (Schomacker et al., 2016; Harning et al., 2016a; 2016b) and the Little Ice Age (LIA) maximum (Brynjólfsson et al., 2014; Harning et al., 2016a). The most recent study on the LIA maximum estimates a size almost twice the current glaciated area (Harning et al., 2016a). A study of 2 JÖKULL No. 66, 2016
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.