Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 110

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 110
three metres tall would provide considerable shelter, to walkers as well as deer and sheep, during bad weather. Restoration issues MacKenzie (2000) recently re- ported on the collation of all existing records for low alpine, subalpine and coastal scrub communities in Scotland. He reports a variable level of infor- mation available for scrub sites, ranging from presence or absence in a ten-kilometre square to a full site description with a map. The majority of re- cords fall in between, reporting presence or absence for a four or six figure ordnance survey grid reference, information which does not allow any assessment of population trends or the via- bility of individual communities. Despite the variation in informa- tion the dataset provides a useful tool for initial work to prioritise restoration activity. It also indi- cates where there is a need for further field work to increase knowledge of the scrub commu- nities in order to better focus resources. A recent condition survey (Marriott, 1994) of thirteen of the remaining thirty-two sites for Salix lanata showed that in at least three sites it was ecologi- cally extinct, having only one sex present, and that the small num- ber of plants surviving at several others brought into question their viability. A similar survey forS. lapponum (Ross, 1996) failed to relocate the plant at four out of fifteen sites in the sample. Data for B. nana by MacKenzie (2000) shows that a number of sites, particularly in the west, have not been recorded since the 1970's. This growing body of evi- dence suggests that these tall shrub communities are under continuing pressure and that action is urgently required to halt their demise. From the start the principle method of establishing forest areas employed by the Forestry Commission has been through planting and the exclusion of larger herbivores by fencing. This practise is increasingly being challenged in projects where the aim is to generate natural her- itage benefits. Fencing is a barri- er to movements of animals, and man, and is a danger to the native woodland grouse Tetrao tetrk L. (Black Grouse) and Tetrao urogallus L. (Capercaille) both of which are in serious decline. However, the former particularly, could benefit substantially from an expansion of the scrub habi- tats that border high forest. This illustrates the dilemma facing restorative efforts within the con- text of overgrazing when culling is politically contentious. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and the Government advisers on Natural Heritage, Scottish Naturai Heritage (SNH), have recently regenerated areas of native birch and pine forest with- out the use of fences, relying on a significantly reduced deer pop- ulation, achieved through culling. However, many montane scrub populations exist in high calcareous valleys where the ground vegetation provides high quality browse. The current imbalance between the size of the remnant plant populations and the numbers of deer is such that it is unclear whether it is possible to restore these scrub communities in the presence of any deer. Demonstration fencing under- taken through the MSR Project has raised questions about the practicality of fencing inside high mountairr/valleys to protect plants gfówing on unstable slopes. Very high levels of fence maintenance were required to mend severe damage each suc- cessive winter, even when the wires were removed over the win- ter period. The resource require- ments for such action are beyond the commitment of a private estate and the current levels of government incentive, to be pro- moted as a serious solution. The classic site for tall moun- tain willows is at the top of an inaccessible cliff, on the wall of a steep hanging valley, or on wet, unstable slopes. Where they might be reached they show signs of browsing (Marriott, 1997). They grow at their most lush along inaccessible stream gorges or on broad cliff ledges. In such situations they are exposed to rockfall, landslip, avalanche and ice plucking and there is annual evidence of the toll this takes on the communities at the sites visited regularly. It is also likely that these ‘typical' mon- tane scrub habitats are only the marginal sites that have been left since an increase in grazing fol- lowing the introduction of sheep to the hills in the nineteenth century (Mardon 1990), has erad- icated these communities from more suitable sites. Both willows and luniper are dioecious. There are a number of colonies of both types which are single sexed and could be con- sidered ecologically extinct. When both sexes are present casual observation suggest that it is important that they are with- in 50m of each other (Marriott, 1997) for effective pollination by their main pollinators - bumble- bees. For many colonies there is no information available on which to base an assessment of long term viability. As interest in indigenous native woodlands has grown, there has been greater under- 108 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.