Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 110

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 110
three metres tall would provide considerable shelter, to walkers as well as deer and sheep, during bad weather. Restoration issues MacKenzie (2000) recently re- ported on the collation of all existing records for low alpine, subalpine and coastal scrub communities in Scotland. He reports a variable level of infor- mation available for scrub sites, ranging from presence or absence in a ten-kilometre square to a full site description with a map. The majority of re- cords fall in between, reporting presence or absence for a four or six figure ordnance survey grid reference, information which does not allow any assessment of population trends or the via- bility of individual communities. Despite the variation in informa- tion the dataset provides a useful tool for initial work to prioritise restoration activity. It also indi- cates where there is a need for further field work to increase knowledge of the scrub commu- nities in order to better focus resources. A recent condition survey (Marriott, 1994) of thirteen of the remaining thirty-two sites for Salix lanata showed that in at least three sites it was ecologi- cally extinct, having only one sex present, and that the small num- ber of plants surviving at several others brought into question their viability. A similar survey forS. lapponum (Ross, 1996) failed to relocate the plant at four out of fifteen sites in the sample. Data for B. nana by MacKenzie (2000) shows that a number of sites, particularly in the west, have not been recorded since the 1970's. This growing body of evi- dence suggests that these tall shrub communities are under continuing pressure and that action is urgently required to halt their demise. From the start the principle method of establishing forest areas employed by the Forestry Commission has been through planting and the exclusion of larger herbivores by fencing. This practise is increasingly being challenged in projects where the aim is to generate natural her- itage benefits. Fencing is a barri- er to movements of animals, and man, and is a danger to the native woodland grouse Tetrao tetrk L. (Black Grouse) and Tetrao urogallus L. (Capercaille) both of which are in serious decline. However, the former particularly, could benefit substantially from an expansion of the scrub habi- tats that border high forest. This illustrates the dilemma facing restorative efforts within the con- text of overgrazing when culling is politically contentious. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and the Government advisers on Natural Heritage, Scottish Naturai Heritage (SNH), have recently regenerated areas of native birch and pine forest with- out the use of fences, relying on a significantly reduced deer pop- ulation, achieved through culling. However, many montane scrub populations exist in high calcareous valleys where the ground vegetation provides high quality browse. The current imbalance between the size of the remnant plant populations and the numbers of deer is such that it is unclear whether it is possible to restore these scrub communities in the presence of any deer. Demonstration fencing under- taken through the MSR Project has raised questions about the practicality of fencing inside high mountairr/valleys to protect plants gfówing on unstable slopes. Very high levels of fence maintenance were required to mend severe damage each suc- cessive winter, even when the wires were removed over the win- ter period. The resource require- ments for such action are beyond the commitment of a private estate and the current levels of government incentive, to be pro- moted as a serious solution. The classic site for tall moun- tain willows is at the top of an inaccessible cliff, on the wall of a steep hanging valley, or on wet, unstable slopes. Where they might be reached they show signs of browsing (Marriott, 1997). They grow at their most lush along inaccessible stream gorges or on broad cliff ledges. In such situations they are exposed to rockfall, landslip, avalanche and ice plucking and there is annual evidence of the toll this takes on the communities at the sites visited regularly. It is also likely that these ‘typical' mon- tane scrub habitats are only the marginal sites that have been left since an increase in grazing fol- lowing the introduction of sheep to the hills in the nineteenth century (Mardon 1990), has erad- icated these communities from more suitable sites. Both willows and luniper are dioecious. There are a number of colonies of both types which are single sexed and could be con- sidered ecologically extinct. When both sexes are present casual observation suggest that it is important that they are with- in 50m of each other (Marriott, 1997) for effective pollination by their main pollinators - bumble- bees. For many colonies there is no information available on which to base an assessment of long term viability. As interest in indigenous native woodlands has grown, there has been greater under- 108 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.