Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2010, Page 67

Jökull - 01.01.2010, Page 67
Reviewed research article Intraplate earthquake swarms in West Bohemia/Vogtland (Central Europe) Josef Horálek and Tomás̆ Fischer Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic fischer@natur.cuni.cz, jhr@ig.cas.cz Abstract — West Bohemia (Czech Republic) and Vogtland (Germany) are among the most active intraplate earthquake-swarm areas in Europe with the largest events mostly of magnitudes ML<4.0. The principal char- acteristics of the West Bohemia/Vogtland earthquake swarms are derived on the basis of local observations from the network WEBNET during the period between 1991 and 2009. Swarm microearthquakes clustered in number of small focal areas; however, about 90% of the total seismic moment was released in the Nový Kos- tel (NK) focal zone, which was formed by an NNW striking and steeply dipping fault plane. The focal depths ranged between 5 and 22 km in the whole region and between 4.5 and 11 km in the NK zone, while most of the swarm events clustered at depths from 8.5 to 9.5 km. All larger earthquake swarms took place in the NK zone; though they were located close, they differed significantly in their evolution. Two swarms, the 2000 (ML≤3.3) and 2008 (ML≤3.8) swarms were located on the same portion of the NK focal zone which implies reactivation of the same fault segment. Attention was paid to source mechanisms of the 1997 and 2000 swarms, particularly to the non-shear components in the 1997-swarm earthquakes. All the 1997 sources were of dipole character: the slightly compressive dipoles dominating in the first swarm phase were replaced by tensile dipoles in the second phase. On the contrary, the 2000 swarm events possessed pure double-couple sources which resulted in pure shears along the NK fault. We infer that the pure-shear rupturing in the 2000 swarm was on account of the favourably oriented NK fault plane with respect to the local tectonic stress field whereas the additional tensile forces were needed for rupturing due to the unfavourably oriented 1997-swarm fault segments. Further, we analyzed statistic characteristics and we show that the magnitude-frequency distribution with the b-value≈1.0 is typical for the West Bohemia/Vogtland earthquake swarms and that scalar moments M0 and the WEBNET magnitudes ML are related according to power-law M0∝10ML , which is inconsistent with the definition of the moment magnitude M0∝101.5Mw given by Kanamori (1977). We also show that this inconsistency results in a discrepancy in b-value of the magnitude-frequency distribution. Taking into account total seismic moment of the 2000 and 2008 swarms we infer that MLMAX ∼5.0 to 5.3 is the maximum expected magnitude in the main NK focal zone and thus in the whole region. There is still an open question concerning the internal and external triggering of the West Bohemia/Vogtland earthquake swarms. We refer to the results of our recent study and in- fer that the earthquake swarm probably represents gradually propagating rupture along the fault and that both static and dynamic Coulomb stress changes along the fault plane due to co-seismic slip contribute significantly to triggering of the swarm events. Repeatedly observed almost simultaneous occurrence of seismic activity in different focal zones suggests that common triggering forces act in a broader area of West Bohemia/Vogtland. JÖKULL No. 60 67
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.