Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2010, Page 77

Jökull - 01.01.2010, Page 77
Intraplate earthquake swarms in Central Europe The source mechanisms of the 2000 swarm differ substantially from those of the 1997 swarm. Simi- larly as in the swarm of 1997, both oblique-normal and oblique-thrust events occurred in 2000, however, the oblique-normal faulting prevailed; besides, the oblique-thrust events were limited to the first swarm phases. The predominant strikes and dips of the 2000- oblique-normal events matched the geometry of the main fault plane Nový Kostel (NK) as well as the strike, dip and rake of the largest ML=4.6 earth- quake of the swarm of 1985/86 (Antonini, 1988). This, together with the localization results (Fischer and Horálek, 2003), suggests that both location and faulting in 1985/86 and 2000 swarms were similar. The resultant mechanisms of all events are dominantly DCs with only insignificant non-DC components usu- ally not exceeding 10% as a whole. The massive dom- inance of the DC in all investigated events implies that the 2000-swarm consisted of a great number of pure shears along the fault plane. The resultant source mechanisms of 1997 and 2000 swarms are represented in two ways (Figure 8). The orientation of the fault planes (DC parts) is de- picted by the composite focal mechanism plots and the non-DC parts using the Hudson at al. (1989) source-type diagrams. Here, the moment tensor is parameterized by the quantities k and T , both vary- ing between –1 and 1. In general, a source with k=1 corresponds to a purely explosive event, while a source with k=–1 corresponds to a pure implosion. The parameter T corresponds to the content of CLVD part. The pure DC sources are uniquely described by k=T=0 (for more details refer to Hudson at al., 1989). The source type plots of 1997 and 2000 swarms significantly differ: while the 1997 sources align along dipole-type axis, the 2000 sources form a tight cluster near the DC source type. The common dipole character of the 1997 sources shows that all events were of the same type; however, the polarity of the dipole varied with time. The slightly compressive dipoles dominating in the first part of the swarm (blue symbols) were replaced by tensile dipoles in the sec- ond part of the swarm (red and yellow symbols). The larger non-DC part of the late events corresponds to the B-type events of tensile character, while the smaller non-DC part of early events corresponds to the A-type events of nearly DC character. However, the systematic non-DC part of most events (extension along common line in the source-type plot) suggests that the non-DC components may not be random. The plausibility of the non-DC character of the 1997 sources is supported by number of tests per- formed by Horálek et al. (2002) to rule out the possi- ble effect of insufficient focal sphere coverage, inac- curate or noisy input data, inexact localization of the hypocentre and poor velocity model on the origina- tion of spurious non-DC components. Another sup- porting argument is the fact that the A and B events were located within a compact cluster and the whole swarm was recorded by the same configuration of the stations. Thus the waves of the A and B events propagated along the similar travel paths. Further- more, we checked the reliability of MTs of the 2000 swarm by means of the jack-knife trials in which the number of stations used in the MT inversions varied from a complete set down to 7 and 6 (Horálek et al., 2010). The reduced data set differed in only two sta- tions (which did not operate in 2000) from that one used to retrieve the MT of the 1997 swarm. The tests proved stability and good constraints of these MT so- lutions. Besides, they evidenced high susceptibility to focal sphere coverage by stations: sparse station distribution resulted in the appearance of false non- DC components, mainly CLVD. However, for all the analyzed events of both 1997 and 2000 swarms, the focal-sphere coverage was sufficient thanks to suit- ably distributed stations NKC, KRC, KOC and LAC which were used in all MT inversions performed. The test also showed that the non-DC parts <15 % can not be consider as significant even in case of a sufficient focal-sphere coverage (for more information of the appearance of false non-DC components due to noise, mislocation of the hypocentre and velocity structure mismodelling, see Horálek et al., 2010). It is evident that the type of faulting depends on the orientation of the fault plane with respect to the lo- cal tectonic stress field. Providing that the stress esti- mations by Havír̆ (2000), Vavryc̆uk (2002) and Plene- fisch and Klinge (2003) (which are fairly similar) are consistent with a steady local stress in the NK zone, JÖKULL No. 60 77
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.