Árbók VFÍ/TFÍ - 01.06.2006, Blaðsíða 360
Táknskýringar
G»: Eðlisvarmi lofts (u.þ.b. 1 kJ/(kgK))
CFVF: Þolmark eldsneytisrúmmálshlutans
CMC: Krítísk samsetning blöndu
D(X)> Þynning með X % massastyrk
LFL: Neðra blossamark
M0: Massi heitra lofttegunda í byrjun
Mvap: Massi gufu til að fá æskilega þynningu
MCH4: Massi óbrenndra lofttegunda (metan)
UFL: Efri blossamörk
Tin: Hiti i byrjun í rými
Tout: Útihitastig
Qfan: Loftflæði PPV blásara
Vfan: Hraði blásturs, frá PPV blásara
Vgas: Rúmmál lofttegunda (lokuðu rými Vgas = 134.4 m3
Vw: Rúmmmál vatns til kælingar lofttegunda fráTin íTflna|.
Y: Þynningarstuðull
y: Þynningarprósenta (%)
AHW: Gufunarvarmi vatns (2260 kj/kg)
pin:= Eðlismassi lofts í rými í byrjun
pout: Eðlismassi kaldra lofttegunda (rými
Heimildir
[1 ] Weng, W.G. and Fan, W.C. Experimental Study ofBackdraft in a Compartment with Different Opening Geometries and its
Mitigation with WaterMist. Journal of Fire Sciences, Vol. 20 - July 2002
[2] Fleischmann, M, and McGrattan, K. B.. Numerical and Experimental Gravity Currents Related to Backdrafts. Fire Safety
Journal 33 (1999) 21-34.
[3] Fleischmann. C.M., Backdraft Phenomena. University of California, Berkley, 1993.
[4] Gojkovic. D. Initial Backdraft Experiments. Report 3121, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University,
Sweden,2001
[5] Gottuk, Peatross, Farley, Williams.The developmentand mitigation ofbackdraft: a real-scale shipboard study. Fire Safety
Journal 33(1999)261-282.
[6] Bengtsson. L-G, Karlsson. B, An Experimental and Statistical Study ofthe Phenomena Flashover, Backdraft and Smoke Gas
Explosion. Presented at the 3rd international seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, 2000.
[7] Chitty. R, A.Surveyon Backdraught. Fire Research Station, Pub No 5/94,1994
[8] Guigay, Karlsson, Eliasson. Numerical and analytical determination of combustion products in strongly underventilated
fires prior to backdraft. Presented in Workshop in Enclosure Fires, FIREsert, 2006.
[9] Eliasson, Guigay, Karlsson. Enclosure fires, gravity currents and the backdraft problem. Intended for publication in
Journal of Fire Sciences. (June 2005).
[10] Guigay, Eliasson, Horvat, Sinai.Semi-analytic and CFD calculation ofgravity flows in backdraftstudies. Intended for pub-
lication in of Fire Safety Journal (February 2006).
[11] Gojkovic. D, Karlsson. B. Describing the Importance of the Mixing Process in a Backdraft Situation Using Experimental
Work and CFD. Presented at the 3rd international seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, 2000.
[12] Bengtsson. L-G. Enclosure fires. Swedish Rescue Services Agency (2001).
[13] Svensson S.,. A study of tacticalpatterns during fire fighting operations. Fire Safety Journal 37 (2002) 673-695.
[14] lceland Fire Authority. Completion ofthe recommendations. Firenet project report (2006)
[15] Kerber. Evaluation oftheAbiiity ofFire DynamicSimulator to simulate Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Laboratory and
Practical scenarios. NIST report NISTIR 7315, April 2006.
[16] Tuomisaari. Smoke Ventilation in operational fire fighting. VTT Publication 326,1997
[17] Positive Pressure Ventilation - PPVin firefighting: http://www.firetactics.com/PPV.htm
[18] Drysdale D.An Introduction to Fire Dynamics. Second edition.Wiley, 1998.
[19] Beyler B. Flammability Limits of Premixed and Diffusion Flames. chapter 2-19 of SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection
Engineering, 2nd edition, NFPA Publication, 1995
[20] Andersson.B,et al.TheCuttingExtinguisher-ConceptandDeveiopment. Swedish RescueServices Agency,Sweden,2001.