Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði


Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.2011, Side 74

Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.2011, Side 74
72 Ragnar Ingi Aðalsteinsson og Sigurður Konráðsson with sl-, sn- with sn- and sm- with sm-), as sp-, st- and sk- had always done. (A few poets also make use of the so-called epenthetic alliteration, where sl- and sn- alliterate with st- (because of the epenthetic [t] that has snuck into the sl- and rw-clusters) and sm- with sp- (because of the epenthetic [p] in the rtw-cluster).) 5-alliteration then reappears in the l8th and I9th century and some poets used it until the loth century, but now it seems to have been completely abandoned again. These changes in alliteration of the initial clusters sl-, sm- and sn- are discussed in this article. The first part of the paper focuses on the devel- opoment and changes in this alliteration in poetry. In the second part these changes are compared to the relative frequency of the relevant initial clusters in eight prose texts from the I3th to the 2ist century. The idea is to investigate if changes in the frequency of allit- eration with these clusters corresponds to changes in their relative frequency in prose texts. In alliteration, all these clusters virtually disappear around 1400 and are not seen after that except as gnystuduls (i.e., alliterating with themselves) until the i-alliteration is revived in the i8th century. In prose, on the other hand, the relative frequency of these clusters appears to be similar throughout the whole time frame. No specific changes appear. The conclusion seems to be that the changes in the use of these clusters in alliter- ation around 1400 must be caused by changes in their pronunciation and/or rules having to do with alliteration in poetry and not by changes in the vocabulary. — In addition, it appears that before 1400 alliteration with sm- is quite limited. When í-alliteration of sl-, sn- and im-clusters comes into use again, mostly during the i8th century, the number of words with sm- as an initial cluster in alliterating words increases considerably. This can be considered an indication that sm- was a gnystudul in ancient times, only alliterating with itself and not with other initial clusters nor with i+vowel. Hence its occurrence was nec- essarily limited in alliteration. Ragnar Ingi Aðabteinsson Menntavísindasviði Háskála Islands Stakkahlíð IS-105 Reykjavík, ÍSLAND ria@hi.is Sigurður Konráðsson Menntavísindasviði Háskóla íslands Stakkahlíð IS-105 Reykjavík, ÍSLAND sigkon@hi.is
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216
Side 217
Side 218
Side 219
Side 220
Side 221
Side 222
Side 223
Side 224
Side 225
Side 226
Side 227
Side 228

x

Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði
https://timarit.is/publication/832

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.