Ráðunautafundur


Ráðunautafundur - 15.02.2001, Side 31

Ráðunautafundur - 15.02.2001, Side 31
21 Comparison of bird populations on organic and conventional farms (Chamberlain et al. 1999) surveyed over thrce breeding seasons indicated a higher species diversity on organic farms. However it was concluded that habitat structure was the rnost important factor affecting bird density not farming type per se. Carabid beetles are considered of bioindicative value for assessing cultivation impacts and changes in habitat quality. A recent review (Kromp 1999) concluded that Carabid beetle numbers were enhanced by organic fertilization and green manuring. Again, an important factor in increased numbers was crop diversity, presence of weeds and field boundaries. Cobb et al. (1999) compared conventional farming with organic farming undergoing conversion and concluded that organic practices can result in biodiversity gains for both plant and inver- tebrate communities. Low-input and organic farming systems also encourage plants, in a range of crops, to produce greater root length and colonisation of root systems by arbuscular mycorrhizae (Mader et al. 2000). This indicates that organic systems may be more efficient in performing a variety of ecological services beyond the production of food, including recy- cling of nutrients, regulation of microclimate, regulation of hydrological processes, suppres- sion of undesirable organisms and the enhanced potential to detoxify noxious chemicals (Altieri 1999). In 1988 Rhone-Poulenc agriculture commenced a long term study comparing conven- tional and organic fann systems producing field crops such as vvheat and beans. This study was extended in 1994 to include an ICMS treatment. The study has many independent col- laborators investigating environmental, ecological and agronomic impacts of the tlnee re- gimes. The ICMS demonstrates a consistent increase in profitability of 2CM0% over the con- ventional system without loss of yield . Even though the organic systern constantly produced lowcr wheat yields (40-50%) the premium associated with the product made organic wheat the most profitable crop. However, the overall performance of the organic system was limited by fertility breaks. Historically, adjusted gross margins frorn the three regimes showed that the highest income was generatcd bv the conventional system, frorn 1990 to 1994, (this was prior to ICM being included in the studv), the ICMS in 1995 and the organic regime from 1996 to 1998. Latterly this has been achieved by a high market demand that maintained a scarcity premium for organic wheats, despite a vield that was 50% less than those from the other systems. Not all organic systems engender such yield penalties. A recent study at The Institute of Grassland and Enviromnental Research on organic rnilk production found that grassland pro- duction fell by 15% in the first year of conversion, but returned to pre-conversion levels as clover became established. However, in common with other studies (Svensson et al. 2000), the animals showed an increased incidence of health problems (Weller and Bowling 2000). The livestock industry of Wales, and indeed the UK, cannot compete at world prices with the big producers such as South America. due to higher costs of production. Thus we have to generate a product with some sort of added value. Products from "naturaT grass-based sys- tems that are constructed to enhance the bio-diversity of the countryside and the use of native breeds will have roles to play in the future. Many outstanding areas of natural beauty exist within Wales and it will become increasingly important to link the product and process. It should be possible to market agricultural products from the Site of Special Scientifíc Interest (SSSI) to the Biosphere scale but this will require a high degree of product traceability. There is little direct evidence that the agricultural product (meat) from these schemes dif- fers in any fundamental way. However, the UK Department of Health has recommended an increase in the intake of unsaturated acids such as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216
Side 217
Side 218
Side 219
Side 220
Side 221
Side 222
Side 223
Side 224
Side 225
Side 226
Side 227
Side 228
Side 229
Side 230
Side 231
Side 232
Side 233
Side 234
Side 235
Side 236
Side 237
Side 238
Side 239
Side 240
Side 241
Side 242
Side 243
Side 244
Side 245
Side 246
Side 247
Side 248
Side 249
Side 250
Side 251
Side 252
Side 253
Side 254
Side 255
Side 256
Side 257
Side 258
Side 259
Side 260
Side 261
Side 262
Side 263
Side 264
Side 265
Side 266
Side 267
Side 268
Side 269
Side 270
Side 271
Side 272
Side 273
Side 274
Side 275
Side 276
Side 277
Side 278
Side 279
Side 280
Side 281
Side 282
Side 283
Side 284
Side 285
Side 286
Side 287
Side 288
Side 289
Side 290
Side 291
Side 292
Side 293
Side 294
Side 295
Side 296
Side 297
Side 298
Side 299
Side 300
Side 301
Side 302
Side 303
Side 304
Side 305
Side 306
Side 307
Side 308
Side 309
Side 310
Side 311
Side 312
Side 313
Side 314
Side 315
Side 316
Side 317
Side 318
Side 319
Side 320
Side 321
Side 322
Side 323
Side 324
Side 325
Side 326
Side 327
Side 328
Side 329
Side 330
Side 331
Side 332
Side 333
Side 334
Side 335
Side 336
Side 337
Side 338

x

Ráðunautafundur

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Ráðunautafundur
https://timarit.is/publication/1260

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.