Ráðunautafundur


Ráðunautafundur - 15.02.2001, Page 31

Ráðunautafundur - 15.02.2001, Page 31
21 Comparison of bird populations on organic and conventional farms (Chamberlain et al. 1999) surveyed over thrce breeding seasons indicated a higher species diversity on organic farms. However it was concluded that habitat structure was the rnost important factor affecting bird density not farming type per se. Carabid beetles are considered of bioindicative value for assessing cultivation impacts and changes in habitat quality. A recent review (Kromp 1999) concluded that Carabid beetle numbers were enhanced by organic fertilization and green manuring. Again, an important factor in increased numbers was crop diversity, presence of weeds and field boundaries. Cobb et al. (1999) compared conventional farming with organic farming undergoing conversion and concluded that organic practices can result in biodiversity gains for both plant and inver- tebrate communities. Low-input and organic farming systems also encourage plants, in a range of crops, to produce greater root length and colonisation of root systems by arbuscular mycorrhizae (Mader et al. 2000). This indicates that organic systems may be more efficient in performing a variety of ecological services beyond the production of food, including recy- cling of nutrients, regulation of microclimate, regulation of hydrological processes, suppres- sion of undesirable organisms and the enhanced potential to detoxify noxious chemicals (Altieri 1999). In 1988 Rhone-Poulenc agriculture commenced a long term study comparing conven- tional and organic fann systems producing field crops such as vvheat and beans. This study was extended in 1994 to include an ICMS treatment. The study has many independent col- laborators investigating environmental, ecological and agronomic impacts of the tlnee re- gimes. The ICMS demonstrates a consistent increase in profitability of 2CM0% over the con- ventional system without loss of yield . Even though the organic systern constantly produced lowcr wheat yields (40-50%) the premium associated with the product made organic wheat the most profitable crop. However, the overall performance of the organic system was limited by fertility breaks. Historically, adjusted gross margins frorn the three regimes showed that the highest income was generatcd bv the conventional system, frorn 1990 to 1994, (this was prior to ICM being included in the studv), the ICMS in 1995 and the organic regime from 1996 to 1998. Latterly this has been achieved by a high market demand that maintained a scarcity premium for organic wheats, despite a vield that was 50% less than those from the other systems. Not all organic systems engender such yield penalties. A recent study at The Institute of Grassland and Enviromnental Research on organic rnilk production found that grassland pro- duction fell by 15% in the first year of conversion, but returned to pre-conversion levels as clover became established. However, in common with other studies (Svensson et al. 2000), the animals showed an increased incidence of health problems (Weller and Bowling 2000). The livestock industry of Wales, and indeed the UK, cannot compete at world prices with the big producers such as South America. due to higher costs of production. Thus we have to generate a product with some sort of added value. Products from "naturaT grass-based sys- tems that are constructed to enhance the bio-diversity of the countryside and the use of native breeds will have roles to play in the future. Many outstanding areas of natural beauty exist within Wales and it will become increasingly important to link the product and process. It should be possible to market agricultural products from the Site of Special Scientifíc Interest (SSSI) to the Biosphere scale but this will require a high degree of product traceability. There is little direct evidence that the agricultural product (meat) from these schemes dif- fers in any fundamental way. However, the UK Department of Health has recommended an increase in the intake of unsaturated acids such as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338

x

Ráðunautafundur

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Ráðunautafundur
https://timarit.is/publication/1260

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.