Bibliotheca Arnamagnæana - 01.06.2005, Síða 23
Observations on Some Manuscripts of Egils saga
13
48,63-64 og med honum vpp fostrast, peir voru myklir menn og sterk- er og kappz fuller (similarly M K), om. W.
50,9 51,5 52,43 54,26-27 dællt (= K, dælst M), hægt W. Einglandz (= M, af Einglande K), vi6 England W. orustustad (= M, orrosto K), orrvstu i sta5 W. f>a Adalst(einn) konungur hafdi fylkt lidi (om. 560) sijnu (similarly M), om. W (and K).
55,48 56,61 56,134 stack suerdinu (= M K), retti sucrSit W. skipveriar (= M), felagar W. kominn til arfs og hun var odal borinn (similarly 0 K), o5al- borin til arfs W.
56,135 57,186 til handa (= 0), om. W (and K). ha sigldu heir (heir sigldu 560) j haf (similarly M), om. W (and K).
57,186 58,30 58,32 59,73 61,23-24 af hafe (= M K), at landi W. andadur (= M K), dau5r W. hleipti (= M K), rei5 W. hitt (= M K), fundit W. ha sæmd og vinattu er konungur hafdi veitt honum (= M K), om. W.
64.8 65,21 67,10-11 69,40 70,2 70.8 82,14 bua sinna (= M), buss sins W (and K). ogillda (= M K), u helga W. og sterkur (= K, similarly M), om. W. hyrfti (= M), villdi W. austur (= M K), om. W. Amvidur (= K, Amfi5r M), Armon W. hafslækur 560, hofz lækur 463 (hafs lgkr b, Hafs lækr M K), stafs lækr W.
82,35 vita (= b M K), muna W.
These examples are casually selected from various parts of the saga and
could easily be multiplied. They offer definite proof that the text in
463/560 is often more original than that in W and consequently any-
thing but ‘valueless’. It is frequently of help in determining which read-
ings are old in the B-redaction and which were introduced in W.
§5.
The text that has thus emerged is no less remarkable in another respect.
As was mentioned earlier, W has lacunae corresponding to EgEA I, ch.
70,9-82,11, and from ch. 85,7 to the end. For these passages Finnur