Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Årgang

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2007, Side 169

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2007, Side 169
Summary It has generally been accepted that the pre-Christian Viking period Icelandic burials are not wealthy and exhibit little differentiation in rank or status. Although the Icelandic pre-Christian burials have been a major focus of research in past half-century, it has only truly begun to flourish in the last decade with various scholars employing new strategies to better understand the Vikings through their burials. The theoretical framework of a gendered archaeological perspective has not been thoroughly employed to understand the societal constructions in the Icelandic Viking period. Indeed, history, contemporary thought and the sagas themselves have provided the leading interpretations of societal relationships and organization regarding this period. Whereas the concepts of wealth, rank and status are well-perceived, gender is still overlooked in the archaeological assessment usually as a result of preconceived notions of division of labor and gravegood associations as well as misconceived notions of the definition of the term “gender.” These mis- and pre-conceived notions of gender associations are, in part, a result of the many decades of archaeology wherein gender was associated solely with biological sex and women were invisible. Such a combination still has an affect on the interpretation of mortuary contexts today. Further complications arise with the difference between a feminist perspective and a gendered perspective wherein the approaches are confused. Although still in its preliminary stages, the long-term goal of this research aims to add to the study of the settlement, settlers and societal constructions by focusing on the burials themselves and including the gendered perspective. The first part of the research was to understand the data at hand within the gendered framework, which is the basis of the following article. A gendered archaeological perspective is sometimes a very confusing focus of study because of the overlapping use of the term “gender” in modern society. In the wide sense of the term and to the general public, the term is used to describe the difference between male and female. However, in the humanities, social sciences and archaeological/ anthropological sciences this term does not mean the difference between male and female, it is much broader and carries with it the social constructions created within societies. The term “sex” is used to describe the biological differences between male and female while “gender” is reserved to indicate the political, social, cutural and symbolic constructions created by the society in question. By using some of the preliminary results of the research project, the following paper attempts to place the pre-Christian Icelandic burial record into a gendered perspective by introducing some of the pitfalls of using sex to understand the society as a whole, as well as using artefacts to assume the sex of the individual. Also, discussion of sex, artefacts and age which are represented in the burial record to date and the direction this research is taking. 168 ÁRBÓK FORNLEIFAFÉLAGSINS
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.