Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Volume

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2007, Page 169

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2007, Page 169
Summary It has generally been accepted that the pre-Christian Viking period Icelandic burials are not wealthy and exhibit little differentiation in rank or status. Although the Icelandic pre-Christian burials have been a major focus of research in past half-century, it has only truly begun to flourish in the last decade with various scholars employing new strategies to better understand the Vikings through their burials. The theoretical framework of a gendered archaeological perspective has not been thoroughly employed to understand the societal constructions in the Icelandic Viking period. Indeed, history, contemporary thought and the sagas themselves have provided the leading interpretations of societal relationships and organization regarding this period. Whereas the concepts of wealth, rank and status are well-perceived, gender is still overlooked in the archaeological assessment usually as a result of preconceived notions of division of labor and gravegood associations as well as misconceived notions of the definition of the term “gender.” These mis- and pre-conceived notions of gender associations are, in part, a result of the many decades of archaeology wherein gender was associated solely with biological sex and women were invisible. Such a combination still has an affect on the interpretation of mortuary contexts today. Further complications arise with the difference between a feminist perspective and a gendered perspective wherein the approaches are confused. Although still in its preliminary stages, the long-term goal of this research aims to add to the study of the settlement, settlers and societal constructions by focusing on the burials themselves and including the gendered perspective. The first part of the research was to understand the data at hand within the gendered framework, which is the basis of the following article. A gendered archaeological perspective is sometimes a very confusing focus of study because of the overlapping use of the term “gender” in modern society. In the wide sense of the term and to the general public, the term is used to describe the difference between male and female. However, in the humanities, social sciences and archaeological/ anthropological sciences this term does not mean the difference between male and female, it is much broader and carries with it the social constructions created within societies. The term “sex” is used to describe the biological differences between male and female while “gender” is reserved to indicate the political, social, cutural and symbolic constructions created by the society in question. By using some of the preliminary results of the research project, the following paper attempts to place the pre-Christian Icelandic burial record into a gendered perspective by introducing some of the pitfalls of using sex to understand the society as a whole, as well as using artefacts to assume the sex of the individual. Also, discussion of sex, artefacts and age which are represented in the burial record to date and the direction this research is taking. 168 ÁRBÓK FORNLEIFAFÉLAGSINS
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.