Múlaþing: byggðasögurit Austurlands - 01.01.1991, Page 29

Múlaþing: byggðasögurit Austurlands - 01.01.1991, Page 29
MÚLAÞING 27 Sami: Old Norse Religion in the Sagas of Icelanders. Reykjavík 1990. (Gripla VII, 303-322). Macrae-Gibson, O.D.: The Topography of Hrafnkels Saga. London 1976. (,Saga-Book of the Viking Society, 239-263). Páll Gíslason: Jökuldalur. Sveitarlýsing. 1974. (Sveitir og jarðir í Múlaþingil, 239-310). Sigurður Gunnarsson: Örnefni frá Jökulsá í Axarfirði austan að Skeiðará. Kaupmannahöfn 1886. (Safn til sögu íslands og íslenzkra bókmenta að fornu og nýju II, 429-497). Stefán Aðalsteinsson: Leitað að kumli fornaldarkonu á Efra-Jökul- dal. Egilsstaðir 1976. (Múlaþing 8, 174-176). Sami: Leitað bæjarrústa við Hitahnúk á Jökuldal. Egilsstaðir 1980. (Múla- þing 10, 192-195). Sveinbjörn Rafnsson: Byggðaleifar í Hrafnkelsdal og á Brúardölum. Reykja- vík 1990. (Rit Hins íslenska fornleifafélags I). The Jökulsdalur men and Hallfreðargata The topography of Hrafnkels saga Freysgoða Summary In this article, Jón Hnefill Aðalsteinsson examines Hrafnkels saga Freysgoða from the viewpoint of local legend and topography. Acc- ording to Aðalsteinsson, the study of local legends can often be extre- mely useful when examining the Icelandic sagas, since both this, and topographical evidence can shed a great deal of light on certain acc- ounts that on the surface appear to be obscure. The inhabitants of Jökulsdalur are only briefly mentioned in Hrafn- kels saga, which states that Hrafnkell „forced the men of Jökulsdalur to submit to his authority“, and that „he was kind and just to his own men, but harsh and ruthless to the men of Jökulsdalur“. On closer examination of the topography of the story, it seems clear that certain central characters (i.e. Bjarni, Sámur’s father, and Sámur himself) did not live in Hrafnkelsdalur as is often believed, but instead came from Jökulsdalur. This therefore substantiates the earlier statement which was probably based on original local legend. The second part of the article deals with Hallfreðargata, about which there has been much controversy amongst scholars. In many editions, the original statement that Hallfreðargata „ran above the hills (’fell’) in the Fljótsdalur district (i.e. Fljótsdals/íérað)“ has been altered to place the hills on the Fljótsdalur moor (Fljótsdals/íe/ði).
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132

x

Múlaþing: byggðasögurit Austurlands

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Múlaþing: byggðasögurit Austurlands
https://timarit.is/publication/1153

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.