Læknablaðið

Årgang

Læknablaðið - 15.06.1999, Side 47

Læknablaðið - 15.06.1999, Side 47
LÆKNABLAÐIÐ 1999; 85 541 8. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Solberg R, Rokseth R, Haaheim LL. Holme I. Benefit of a Stroke Unit: A Randomized Con- trolled Trial. Stroke 1991; 22; 1026-31. 9. The National Institute for Neurological Disorder and Stroke rt-PA Study Group. Tissue Palsminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Slroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581-7. 10. Langhome P, Dennis MS, eds. Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach. London: BMJ Publishing Group 1998. 11. Bamford J, Sahdercock P, Dennis M, Bum J, Warlow C. Classifícation and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337: 1521-6. 12. Adams GF. Prognosis and prospects of strokes. In: Anony- mous. Cerebrovascular disability and the aging brain. Edin- burgh: Churchill Livingstone 1974. 13. Pimer SE, Mance CJ. An Evaluation ofStroke Intensive Care: Results in a Municipal Hospital. Stroke 1973; 4 :737-41. 14. Norris JW, Hachinski V. Stroke Units or Stroke Centers? Stroke 1986; 17: 360-2. 15. Kennedy FB, Pozen TJ, Gabelman EH, Thuthill JE, Zaentz SD. Stroke Intensive Care - An appraisal. Am Heart J 1970; 80: 188-96. 16. Mikolich JR, Jacobs WC, Fletcher GF. Cardiac Arrhyth- mias in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents. JAMA 1981:246: 1314-7. 17. Chiu D, Grotta JC. Control Group Provides Wealth of New Data on Poststroke Arrhythmias. Neurology Reviews March 1998. 18. Lavy S, Yaar I, Melamed E. The Effect of Acute Stroke on Cardiac Function as Observed in an Intensive Stroke Care Unit. Stroke 1974; 5: 775-80. 19. Heaney LM. Cardiac and Respiratory Monitoring of Acute Stroke Patents. Heart Lung 1977; 6. 469-74. 20. Norris JW, Hachinski VC. Intensive Care Management of Stroke Patients. Stroke 1976; 7: 573-7. 21. Burch CE, Mayers R, Abildskov JA. A New Electrocardio- graphic Pattem Observed in Cerebrovascular Accidents. Circulation 1954; 6: 719-23. 22. Wood-Dauphinee S, Shapiro S, Bass E. A randomized con- trolled trial of team care following stroke. Stroke 1984; 5: 864-72. 23. Stone SP. The Mount Vemon stroke service: a feasibility study to determine whether it is possible to apply the prin- ciples of stroke management to patients and their families on general medical wards. Age Aging 1987; 16: 81-8. 24. Garraway WM. Stroke rehabilitation units: consept, eva- luation and unresolved issues. Stroke 1985; 16: 178-81. 25. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K. Do Stroke units save lives? Lancet 1993; 342: 395-8. 26. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. Effecl of correla- ting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine. BrMed J 1996; 312: 1503-5. 27. Kalra L, Dale P, Crome P. Improving Stroke Rehabilitation. AControlled Study. Stroke 1993; 24: 1462-7. 28. Kalra L, Eade J. Role of stroke rehabilitation: a controlled sludy. Stroke 1993: 26: 2031-4. 29. Hankey G, Deleo D, Stewart-Waynne EG. Acute hospital care for stroke patients. A randomized trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995:5:228. 30. Indredvik B et al. 8th Nordic Meeting on Cerebrovascular disease, August 1995, Tronheim, Norway. 31. Laupacis A, Sackett D, Roberts RS. An Assessment of Clinically useful measures of the Consequences of Treat- ment. N Engl J M 1988; 318: 1728-33. 32. Duncan D, Ritchie L, Jemieson D, Donaldson L. Stroke unit. BMJ 1995:310: 193-4. 33. Isard PA, Forbes JF. The cost of stroke to the National Health Services in Scotland. Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke 1992; 2; 47-50. 34. Donnan GA. Lifesaving for stroke. Lancet 1993; 342: 383-4. 35. Dennis M, Langhome P. So Stroke units save lives: where do we go from here? BMJ 1994; 309: 1273-7. 36. Kalra L. Does Age Affect Benefits of Stroke Unit Rehabili- tation? Stroke 1994; 25: 346-51. 37. Hospitalist Neurology. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann Publisher, Medical Division 1999. 38. Valdimarsson EM. Heilablóðfallseining á endurhæfinga- og taugadeild SHR. ÖBÍ. Fréttabréf Öryrkjabandalags íslands 1998; 11(2): 24-5.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104

x

Læknablaðið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.