Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2012, Qupperneq 181

Jökull - 01.01.2012, Qupperneq 181
Structural evolution of the 1890 Brúarjökull end moraine a few high-angle normal faults at 1–3 m that dip 80- 85◦ S, a high-angle backthrust at ∼7 m dipping 75◦ NE, and a number of low-angle normal faults, partic- ularly in the lower part (below 3 m) (Figure 7). The most prominent structures in the central part are large north verging, overturned polyclinal folds at 0–2 m with upglacier dipping axial planes. The white Öræfa- jökull AD 1362 tephra marker, LPT beds, and tephra layers outline the fold axis which plunges 8◦ W. The abovementioned high-angle normal faults cross-cut the folds as do thrust faults in the upper part that corre- late with the thrusts described from the section at 0–2 m (Figure 7). At ca. 1 m, the white tephra outlines an- other prominent fold but its limbs are not easily iden- tified due to intense faulting. From 4 to 6 m, there are upglacier inclined beds of LPT and tephra that are repeated upwards. These beds are thought to repre- sent multiple fold limbs while the fold hinges have ei- ther been eroded away (above) or are buried (below). In the upper part at 6–9 m, there are a number of in- clined, north-verging folds with shallow axial plunge towards west. The limbs and hinges of these folds are commonly cross-cut by high-angle normal faults and backthrusts, some of which are slightly folded and thus indicating fault formation before folding was completed. The distal slope, 9–12.7 m. The most dominant structures in this part of the section are fairly steeply inclined, south verging folds with axes plunging 4◦ towards east. This is typified, in particular, at around 12 m where black tephra and LPT beds outline the folds. The fold vergence to the south suggests an obstacle in front of the moraine that created a counter-stress from the north during the moraine-ridge formation. The deformation in section 3 probably initiated in a similar manner as in sections 0, 1, and 2, i.e. with small-scale folding of the lower strata and subsequent open folding and shearing of the upper strata across the lower part. It is suggested that sections 3 rep- resents the most developed stage in the end moraine formation with an additional phases of multiple fold- ing and faulting before the deformation ceased. The main faulting phase occurred towards the end of the moraine formation. This is evident from fre- quent cross-cutting by faults through folds. However, slightly folded fault planes indicate that faulting com- menced shortly before folding ceased. Steeply dipping normal and thrust faults are com- mon in section 3. They show little consistency in terms of orientation although the principal vector plots as dipping towards WNW. Although the orien- tation of only five fold axes could be measured di- rectly, they show remarkably strong east-west orien- tation, which corresponds to stress induced from the south or north. Thus, the fold axes seem to be a more reliable structural indicator of the direction of stress than faults (Figure 7). The general steepness of both folds and faults in the section indicates that the folds are rooted and that the glaciotectonic stress was ab- sorbed within a relatively narrow zone bounded by the glacier to the south and permafrost to the north. Due to the multiple folding and intense faulting, in particular, it is very difficult to trace marker hori- zons through the section. Therefore, it is impossible to apply line and area balancing to the entire section 3. However, and just to get a glimpse of the total hor- izontal shortening at this site, line balancing was ap- plied to the polyclinal folds at 0–2 m, through which the tephra marker horizons could be followed. This revealed a horizontal shortening of 76%, which, be- cause of the common refolding in the section, must be considered to be fairly representative for the moraine ridge at this site. POLYPHASE STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE 1980 END MORAINE Together with a marginal sediment wedge, the 1890 end moraine forms a dual, marginal end product of the 1890 surge (Benediktsson et al., 2008). Much of the deformation observed in the end-moraine ridge, par- ticularly in the proximal part, can be regarded as part of the wedge formation, and the basal décollement must therefore be common for these two ice-marginal components (Benediktsson et al., 2008). The four sections in the end moraine reveal different styles and magnitudes of deformation and by studying the mor- phology of the 1890 end moraine, Benediktsson et al. JÖKULL No. 62, 2012 179
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196
Qupperneq 197
Qupperneq 198
Qupperneq 199
Qupperneq 200

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.