Ritið : tímarit Hugvísindastofnunar - 01.05.2004, Page 215

KENNILEG FORNLEIFAFRÆÐI
Moore, H.L. 1985. Space, text and gender. Cambridge.
O’Brien, M.J. og Holland T.D. 1992. The role of adaptation in archaeological
explanation. American Antiquity 57, bls. 36-59.
Olsen, B. 1991. Metropolises and satelhtes in archaeology. I Preucel, R. (ritstj.).
Procesmal and postprocesmal archaeology. Southem Illinois University Centre for
Archaeological Investigation, Occasional Paper 10, bls. 211-24.
Paddayya, K. 1995. Theoretical perspectives in Indian archaeology. I Ucko, P. (ritstj.).
Theory in archaeology. A world perspective. London, bls. 110-49.
Paranjpe, M. 1990. The invasion of ‘theory5; an Indian respone. New Quest 81, bls. 151-61.
Petrie, F. 1904. Methods and aims in archaeology. London.
Pitt Rivers, A.H.L.F. 1896. The evolution ofculture and other essays. Oxford.
Pohtis, G. 1995. The socio-politics of the development of archaeology in Hispanic
South America. I Ucko, P. (ritstj.). Theory in archaeology. A worldperspective. London,
bls. 197-235.
Preucel, R. 1995. The postprocessual condition. Joumal of Archaeological Research 3, bls.
147-75.
Preucel, R. og Hodder, I. 1996. Contemporary archaeology in theoty: a reader. Oxford.
Raab, L.M. og Goodyear, A.C. 1984. Middle range theory in archaeology. American
Antiquity 49, bls. 255-68.
Renffew, C. 1982. Towards an archaeology ofmind. Cambridge.
Renffew, C. 1994. Toward a cognitive archaeology. I Renffew, C. og Zubrow, E. (ritstj.).
The ancient mind. Cambridge, bls. 3-12.
Renffew, C. og Cooke, K. 1979. Transformations: mathematical approaches to culture change.
London.
Schiffer, M.B. 1987. Formation processes ofthe archaeological record. Albuquerque.
Schiffer, M.B. 1995. Behavioural Archaeology: firstprinciples. Salt Lake City.
Shanks, M. ogTilley, C. 1987. Re-constructing archaeology. Cambridge.
Shennan, S. 1989. Cultural transmission and cultural change. I van der Leeuw, S.E. og
Torrence, R. (ritstj.). What’s new? London, bls. 330-46.
Tanudirjo, D.A. 1995. Theoretical trends in Indonesian archaeology. I Ucko, P. (ritstj.).
Theory in archaeology. A worldperspective. London, bls. 61-75.
Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity. London.
Tilley, C. 1990. The art of antiquity: material culture and text. London.
Trigger, B. 1978. Time and traditions. New York.
Trigger, B. 1984. Altemative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man 19,
bls. 355-70.
Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge.
Tsude, H. 1995. Archaeological theory in Japan. I Ucko, P. (ritstj.). Theory in archaeology.
A worldperspective. London, bls. 298-311.
Ucko, P. (ritstj.). 1995. Theory in archaeology. A worldperspective. London.
van der Leeuw, S.E. ogTorrence, R. (ritstj.). 1989. What’s new? London.
Watson, P.J., Redman, C. og Leblanc, S. 1971. Explanation in archaeology: an explicitly
scientific approach. New York.
Whitley, D. 1998. Reader in archaeological theory: postprocessual and cognitive approaches.
London.
Wylie, A. 1989. Archaeological cables and tadting: the implications of practice for
Bemstein’s ‘Options beyond objectivism and relativism’. Philosophy of the Social
Sciences 19, bls. 1-18.
2I3