Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.01.2012, Qupperneq 102

Jökull - 01.01.2012, Qupperneq 102
S. Guðmundsson et al. DATA The photographs of Frederick W.W. Howell were taken from two locations on Sandfell mountain (Fig- ures 1 and 2): a) one shot towards east to Rótar- fjall from Howellssteinn (N63.9497◦, W16.7587◦, elevation 573 m a.s.l.) and b) two shots from Howellsnöf (N63.9624◦, W16.7286◦, elevation 1020 m), 1)northeast towards Rótarfjallshnúkur (1833 m) across the upper slopes of the Kotárjökull, and 2)east towards Rótarfjall. Howellssteinn and Howellsnöf are not geographical place names, but used as landmarks by the authors. The photographs confirm, that the highest lateral moraines, trimlines and glacial errat- ics in the narrow gorges of Kotárgil and Berjagil are from the 1890 LIA maximum (Figure 2) . In Novem- ber 2011 the two locations were revisited, the pho- tos reframed, and the acquired duplicates (Figures 3a- b, 4a-b and 5a-b) used to calculate the recession of the glacier between 1891 and 2011. Howell’s pho- tographs are available in the Fiske Icelandic Collec- tion, at the Cornell University Library website. High-resolution aerial images of Loftmyndir ehf© (2003) were used to outline the LIA maximum glacier. In situ and oblique aerial photographs of 2006 and 2010, helped derive the glacial extent. A recent DEM, produced from airborne LiDAR measurements in August 2010 and September 2011 (data from the Icelandic Meteorological Office and the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, 2011; Jóhannesson et al., 2012); provides accurate position and elevation (Table 1). The DEM has a horizontal resolution of 5x5 m and vertical accuracy within 0.5 m. It provides precise elevation of the lat- eral moraines and trimlines. METHODS The extent of Kotárjökull at the LIA maximum, was based on photographic and geomorphological evi- dence, and the LiDAR DEM providing basic topo- graphical data. The glacier margin in the ablation area, is delineated from the highest lateral moraines, glacial erratics, and trimlines. Data on elevation changes above the equilibrium line are restricted to the old photographs. The idea of obtaining quanti- tative estimates of glacier changes from the photo- graphic duplicates, originates from methods used in astrometry. The movements of distant objects are measured over time from separate images, taken hours to decades apart. Repeat photography The three photographic pairs of Kotárjökull were col- limated in GIS ArcMap (Figures 3a-b, 4a-b, 5a-b). A 3D-image, a duplication of Figure 3b, was produced from the DEM in ArcScene, to improve the accuracy of our measurements. The southeastern flank of Rót- arfjallshnúkur has apparently undergone some land- form changes since 1891, perhaps a landslide. The photos in Figures 3a-b were collimated, using the northern (I) and southern (II) peaks of Rótarfjalls- hnúkur for reference, the top of Sandfell (III), and a crevasse area (IV) on the horizon to the west of Rót- arfjallshnúkur (Figure 6). The photographs in Figures 4a-b were referenced with four points, and in Figures 5a-b, with 10 points. The ease of collimating the du- plicate photos, indicates minimal errors related to the older camera’s focal length. Nine crevasse areas in the accumulation area (Fig- ures 3a-b), were used for surface elevation calcula- tions. The lowering was measured in pixel units and converted to metres. A total of 7 measurements evenly distributed over each crevasse bulge, from center to- wards left (l1−3) and right (r1−3), were used to obtain a mean pixel value for the surface lowering (Figure 6 and Table 1). Two independent routines to calculate the glacier surface changes in metres were used. Routine 1 The vertical glacier surface change (∆h) at any dis- tance (d) from the site of photography was estimated by scaling in metres the pixel unit size (θu= H/nm) based on a known vertical height of a mountain cliff (H spanning nm pixels) at a known distance (Do), in this case Rótarfjallshnúkur (Figure 6). If the measured surface lowering of a crevasse area in pixel units is nc, the corresponding glacier surface change in metres is: ∆h = θu × (d/Do) × nc The northern face of Rótarfjallshnúkur is 60 m high (HI ) and nmI = 30 pixels, hence θuI = 2.0 m/pixel; the distance to the face from Howellsnöf isDI= 3.650 100 JÖKULL No. 62, 2012
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196
Qupperneq 197
Qupperneq 198
Qupperneq 199
Qupperneq 200

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.