Ljósmæðrablaðið - 01.12.2022, Blaðsíða 101

ljósmæðrablaðið ljósmæðrablaðið
1. tölublað · 100. árgangur · desember 2022 101100 1. tölublað · 100. árgangur · desember 2022
Heimildir
Anand, K. J. S., Eriksson, M., Boyle, E. M., Avila­Alvarez, A., Andersen, R. D.,
Sarafidis, K., Pölkki, T., Matos, C., Lago, P., Papadouri, T., Attard­Montalto,
S., Ilmoja, M. L., Simons, S., Tameliene, R., van Overmeire, B., Berger, A.,
Dobrzanska, A., Schroth, M., Bergqvist, L., Courtois, E., Rousseau, J. og
Carbajal, R. (2017). Assessment of continuous pain in newborns admitted to
NICUs in 18 European countries. Acta Paediatrica, 106(8), 1248–1259. doi.
org/10.1111/apa.13810.
Ballantyne M., Stevens B., McAllister M., Dionne K. og Jack A. (1999). Validation
of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clinical Journal
Pain, 15(4), 297­303. doi: 10.1097/00002508­199912000­00006. PMID:
10617258.
Beltramini, A., Milojevic, K. og Pateron, D. (2017). Pain assessment in
newborns, infants, and children. Pediatric Annals, 46(10), e387–e395. doi.
org/10.3928/19382359­20170921­03.
Ercan, I., Yazici, B., Sigirli, D., Ediz, B., og Kan, I. (2007). Examining Cronbach
Alpha, Theta, Omega Reliability Coefficients According to Sample Size.
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 291­303. doi.org/10.22237/
jmasm/1177993560.
Eriksson, M. og Campbell­Yeo, M. (2019). Assess ment of pain in newborn infants.
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 24(4), 101003. doi.org/10.1016/j.
siny.2019.04.003.
Faye, P. M., de Jonckheere, J., Logier, R., Kuissi, E., Jeanne, M., Rakza, T.
og Storme, L. (2010). Newborn infant pain assessment using heart rate
variability analysis. Clinical Journal of Pain, 26(9), 777–782. doi.org/10.1097/
ajp.0b013e3181ed1058.
Gibbins, S., Stevens, B. J., Yamada, J., Dionne, K., Campbell­Yeo, M., Lee, G.,
Caddell, K., Johnston, C., og Taddio, A. (2014). Validation of the Premature
Infant Pain Profile­Revised (PIPP­R). Early human development, 90(4), 189­
193. doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.005.
Hatfield, L. (2014). Neonatal pain: What’s age got to do with it? Surgical Neurology
International, 5, S479–S489. doi.org/10.4103/2152­7806.144630.
Hatfield, L. A. og Ely, E. A. (2015). Measurement of acute pain in infants: A
review of behavioral and physiological variables. Biological Research For
Nursing, 17(1), 100–111. doi.org/10.1177/1099800414531448.Johnston, C.,
Fernandes, A. M. og Campbell­Yeo, M. (2011). Pain in neonates is different.
Pain, 152(3 Suppl), S65–S73. doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.008.
Maxwell, L. G., Malavolta, C. P. og Fraga, M. V. (2013). Assessment of pain
in the neonate. Clinics in Perinatology, 40(3), 457–469. doi.org/10.1016/j.
clp.2013.05.001.
McPherson, C., Miller, S. P., El­Dib, M., Massaro, A. N. og Inder, T. E. (2020).
The influence of pain, agitation, and their management on the immature
brain. Pediatric Research, 88(2), 168–175. doi.org/10.1038/s41390­019­0744­6.
Olsson, E., Anderzén­Carlsson, A., Atladóttir, S. M., Axelin, A., Campbell­Yeo,
M., Eriksson, M., Kristjánsdóttir, G., Peltonen, E., Stevens, B., Vederhus,
B., & Andersen, R. D. (2018). Cultural adaptation and harmonization of four
Nordic translations of the revised Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP­R).
BMC pediatrics, 18(1), 349. doi.org/10.1186/s12887­018­1322­5.
Pölkki, T., Korhonen, A. og Laukkala, H. (2018). Nurses’ perceptions of pain
assessment and man agement practices in neonates: A cross­sec tion al survey.
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(2), 725–733. doi.org/10.1111/
scs.12503.
Rahimi, O., Godarzi, Z., Khalessi, N., Soleimani, F., Mohamadi, N. og Shamshiri,
A. (2017). The implementation of pain management and assessment in
neonatal intensive care units of teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran
University of medical sciences. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences,
19(6), 28–34.
Ranger, M., Johnston, C. og Anand, K. (2007). Current controversies regarding
pain assessment in neonates. Seminars in Perinatology, 31, 283–288. doi.
org/10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.003.
Relland, L. M., Gehred, A. og Maitre, N. L. (2019). Behavioral and physiological
signs for pain assessment in preterm and term neonates during a nociception­
specific response: A systematic review. Pediatric Neurology, 90, 13–23. doi.
org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.10.001.
Rioualen, S., Durier, V., Hervé, D., Misery, L., Sizun, J. og Roué, J. M.
(2018). Cortical pain response of newborn infants to venepuncture: A
randomized controlled trial comparing analgesic effects of sucrose versus
breastfeeding. Clinical Journal of Pain, 34(7), 650–656. doi.org/10.1097/
ajp.0000000000000581.
Sigríður María Atladóttir. (2017). Verkjamat fyrir fyrirbura PIPP­R: þýðing og
menningarleg aðlögun. (Óútgefin M.Sc. ritgerð). Háskóli Íslands.
Slater, R., Worley, A., Fabrizi, L., Roberts, S., Meek, J., Boyd, S. og Fitzgerald,
M. (2010). Evoked potentials generated by noxious stimulation in the human
infant brain. European Journal of Pain, 14(3), 321–326. doi.org/10.1016/j.
ejpain.2009.05.005.
Spence, D. (2010). Pain revisited: Evidence for opioids. BMJ, 340.
Stevens, B., Yamada, J., Lee, G. Y. og Ohlsson, A. (2013). Sucrose for analgesia
in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, (1), CD001069. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001069.
pub4.Stevens, B., Gibbins, S., Yamada, J., Dionne, K., Lee, G., Johnston, C.
og Taddio, A. (2014). The premature infant pain profile­revised (PIPP­R):
Initial validation and feasibility. Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(3), 238–243. doi.
org/10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182906aed.
Theja Lankathilaka. (2018). Forprófun á endurskoðuðum PIPP­R við verkjamat nýbura
á nýburagjörgæslu á Íslandi. Hjúkrunarfræðideild. Háskóli Íslands. Reykjavík,
Ísland.
Valeri, B. O., Holsti, L. og Linhares, M. B. (2015). Neonatal pain and develop­
mental outcomes in children born preterm: A systematic review. Clinical
Journal of Pain, 31(4), 355–362. doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000114.
Walter­Nicolet, E., Annequin, D., Biran, V., Mitanchez, D. og Tourniaire, B.
(2010). Pain management in newborns: From prevention to treatment.
Paediatric Drugs, 12(6), 353–365. doi.org/10.2165/11318900­000000000­
00000.
Background
The life expectancy of prematurely born
neonates has increased in the past years
and neonatal inten sive care units (NICU)
have seen more ad mis sions. The neonates
must go through painful inter ven tions
due to necessary treatments. Pain assess­
ment for new­borns is complicated and
especially for premature neonates. To
this day there is no golden standard for
pain assessment in this sensitive popu­
lation. It is important to adapt reliable
and vali dated pain assessment scales with
known clin i cal applicability in NICU
care. The goal of this re search is to test
the feasibility, validity, and relia bility of
(IcePIPP­R) scale in an Icelandic NICU.
Method
The study used a cross over randomized
design with a convenience sample of 50
preterm and sick neonates with cor rect­
ed gestational age from 23 – 42 weeks
staying at a NICU in Iceland during the
time of data collection. Two re searchers
conducted pain assessment with the Ice­
PIPP­R scale in three different con di­
tions, impartial, disturbed, and pain ful.
Data was processed with SPSS – pro­
gram using descriptive and ex plana­
tory statistics. Anal ysis of variance was
used and correlation tests (ANOVA,
Cronbach’s, and Pearson’s) with the help
of the SPSS statistic program.
Results
Findings show that there is an inter­rater
reliability between all measurements
and also significant cor re lation between
ma jor ity of assessment factors in the Ice­
PIPP­R scale and no significant differ­
ence between raters in any of the three
different situa tions. Inter consistency
between both re searchers was acceptable
in all of the three situa tions. The variance
analysis showed that the IcePIPP­R scale
shows significant difference between all
mea sure ments in different situations and
therefore shows inner legitimacy when
assessing the pain levels of neonates
show ing a monotonic increase in mea­
sured pain in suggested pain events.
Conclusion
The findings present a reliability and le­
git imacy of the IcePIPP­R scale when
assessing pain at the NICU in Iceland
and confirms the feasibility of the revised
edition and the use of the Ice PIPP­R
scale in clinical practice. The pain assess­
ment tool is a welcomed con tribution to
improve the quality in the management
of pain in premature and sick new­borns
in Iceland.
Key words
premature neonates
sick neonates
pain
pain assessment
AbstractAuthors
Theja Lankathilaka,
RN, BS, MS 1, 2
Sigríður María Atladóttir,
RN, BS, MS 2
Dr. Guðrún Kristjánsdóttir,
professor, RN, BS, MSc,
PhD 1, 2, 3
1 Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery,
University of Iceland.
2 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit,
Children’s Hospital, Landspítali
National University Hospital of
Iceland.
3 Department of Health Science,
Faculty of Medicine, Lund
University.
english summary
PIPP­R Pain Assessment for Premature
Infants and Sick New­Borns, Testing an
Icelandic Translation