Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1968, Blaðsíða 82

90
On Some Cases of Interaction
móg, mut, skell, tdr, well4).
inf. I
wás know
kaan can
schánn shall
moog may
món must
wánn will
1 sing. pres. indic.
wit
kaan
schall
mai
mot
wall
1—3 pl. pres. indic.
wás
kánn
schánn
moog
mon
wánn5)
On the other hand cf. the forms of inf. I of preterite-present
verbs in Old and Modern written Frisian:
Old Frisian
kunna, konna
skila, skela, schela, sela
wilila, wella
thura, dura, thora, dora
wita, weta6)
Modern Frisian
kinne
sille
wolle
doare
wita7)
The appearance of the above secondary forms of inf. I of
the preterite-present verbs in Frisian probably is explained by
the extention of the inflection of 3 pl. pres. indic. of weak
and strong verbs to the forms of 1—3 pl. pres. indic. of pre-
terite-present verbs. This partly is already oharacteristic of
Old Frisian8) and of Low German9).
4) J. Schmidt-Petersen and J. M. A. Craigie. The North Frisian Dia-
lect of Fohr and Amrum, Edinburgh, 1928, p. 32.
5) Nordfriesische Beitráge aus dem Nachlass H. Mollers. Bearb. und
hrsg. von P. Jørgensen. Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Hist.-
filol. Meddelelser XXIV, I, København, 1936, S. 110.
6) K. F. Richthofen. Altfriesisches Worterbuch, Neudruck der Ausgabe,
Gottingen, 1840, 1961, SS. 881, 1030, 1150, 1081, 1153.
7) K. Fokkema. Beknopte Friese Spraakkunst, Groningen-Batavia, 1948,
s. 58.
8) W. Steller. Abriss der altfriesischen Grammatik, Halle/Saale, 1928,
S. 68.
9) Chr. Sarauw. Die Flexionen der Mittelniederdeutschen Sprache.