Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1968, Side 91

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1968, Side 91
On Some Cases of Interaction 99 Norwegian and landsmal due to structural factors, i. e. to the extention of inflection -er from singular to all the forms of plural present indicative is no more typical of Modern Danish and riksmal. Thus, the different chronology of the appearance of the above phonetic identity is explained by the individual features in structures of the given languages, while the com- mon tendency to suoh coincidence is determined by the exi- stence in structures and systems of these languages of common features, e. g. of the connection between the non-finite and finite verbal forms. Among the facts whioh prove the existence of the correlation between the pre-infinitive particle and 3 pl. pres. indic. is tthe different frequency of the pre-infinitive particle in Old and Modern Swedish. In Old Swedish, in which just as in most Scandinavian languages, the forms of inf. I and 3 pl. pres. indic. owing to the loss of final consonants were homonymic, the frequency of the pre-infinitive particle was high. On the contrary, in Modern Swedish of which is characteristic the levelling of inflections in singular and plural of present indica- tive, owing to which the forms of inf. I and 3 pl. pres. indic. are not homonymic, the frequency of the pre-infinitive par- ticle is lower than in Old Swedish. Besides, very often this par- ticle is omitted.28) The above facts and hypothesis permit to give definite interpretation to the term »analogy«, when it is applied for the explanation of phonetical coincidence of the forms dis- cussed. It makes doubtful the hypothesis that in individual languages these forms have coincided with, owing to purely phonetical reasons, despite the fact that this process took place in individual languages at different periods of their develop- ment. It seems more probable that similar results of different phonetical changes were determined by some common faotors, e. g. functional and systemic ones, among which the principal 2S) J. Mjoberg. Infinitivmárket pa glid ? »Modersmallárarnas forening«, Ársskrift 1950.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.