Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1968, Page 91

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1968, Page 91
On Some Cases of Interaction 99 Norwegian and landsmal due to structural factors, i. e. to the extention of inflection -er from singular to all the forms of plural present indicative is no more typical of Modern Danish and riksmal. Thus, the different chronology of the appearance of the above phonetic identity is explained by the individual features in structures of the given languages, while the com- mon tendency to suoh coincidence is determined by the exi- stence in structures and systems of these languages of common features, e. g. of the connection between the non-finite and finite verbal forms. Among the facts whioh prove the existence of the correlation between the pre-infinitive particle and 3 pl. pres. indic. is tthe different frequency of the pre-infinitive particle in Old and Modern Swedish. In Old Swedish, in which just as in most Scandinavian languages, the forms of inf. I and 3 pl. pres. indic. owing to the loss of final consonants were homonymic, the frequency of the pre-infinitive particle was high. On the contrary, in Modern Swedish of which is characteristic the levelling of inflections in singular and plural of present indica- tive, owing to which the forms of inf. I and 3 pl. pres. indic. are not homonymic, the frequency of the pre-infinitive par- ticle is lower than in Old Swedish. Besides, very often this par- ticle is omitted.28) The above facts and hypothesis permit to give definite interpretation to the term »analogy«, when it is applied for the explanation of phonetical coincidence of the forms dis- cussed. It makes doubtful the hypothesis that in individual languages these forms have coincided with, owing to purely phonetical reasons, despite the fact that this process took place in individual languages at different periods of their develop- ment. It seems more probable that similar results of different phonetical changes were determined by some common faotors, e. g. functional and systemic ones, among which the principal 2S) J. Mjoberg. Infinitivmárket pa glid ? »Modersmallárarnas forening«, Ársskrift 1950.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.