Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2009, Side 106

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2009, Side 106
104 YEAR-ROUND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE OF INDIVIDUAL NEST-SITE ATTENDANCE OF NORTHERN FULMARS IN THE FAROE ISLANDS copulations were recorded at effectively all hours (between 02 and 23 hrs), hence not only during daylight. Besides there was no peak in frequency but a considerable varia- tion between the pairs with regard to fre- quency and days between first and last cop- ulation as well as total number of inseminations (Table 6). In all cases at least one of the birds in the pair departed for a pre-laying exodus shortly after the last cop- ulation and all but two of the pairs laid eggs upon the return to the nest-site 3-4 weeks later. The Northern Fulmar, like Leach's Storm-petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa), Horned Puffin (Fratercula corniculata) and probably some other pelagic seabirds, have sperm-storage glands which allows the part- ners to be separated for weeks (Hatch, 1983). It is believed that fertilization occurs within a few days prior to laying and it is suggested that the probability of paternity is deter- mined by the frequency and timing of in- seminations due to physiological constraints (Hunter, 1998). Female fulmars engage in extra-pair copulations (EPCs) but the extra- pair paternity appears to be < 5% (Hatch, 1987a; Hunter et al„ 1992; Hunter, 1998). We did not record any EPCs, possibly because of the small sample size and too few individu- ally marked birds. A pre-laying exodus is a common feature to most procellariids, including the North- ern Fulmar (see Introduction); though with some intra- and interspecific variation with regard to length in time and sex-biased par- ticipation (Warham, 1990, Brooke, 1990; Mallory and Forbes, 2007). In our study colony the exodus was more noticeable in 2006, when fewer birds occupied the moni- tored nest-sites in May than at correspon- ding time in 2007 (Fig. 1). However, this dif- ference is attributable to nest-site no. 2 in May 2007 when one of the birds was present all the time, but when these data are ex- cluded in the analysis the exodus is equally pronounced as in 2006. This also exemplifies the great between-nest variation in atten- dance in May. While the length of the pre- laying exodus ranged from 21 to 32 days the number of days when a given site was visiting during that period ranged from 1 to 25 days (Table 7). In two of three cases when ringed birds were involved it was the male that stayed behind and more or less regularly at- tended the nest-site, which is consistent with previous studies of the species and some other procellariids (Dunnet et al„ 1963; Hatch, 1983; Brooke, 1990). This sex-biased exodus is often discussed in terms of the fe- males' need to build up substantial food re- serves to be able to form the relatively large egg (Lack, 1966) and to participate in the in- cubation duties, whereas the males need to prepare for the first stints of incubation and to endure the long spells of fasting (Warham, 1990; Mallory and Forbes, 2007). In a study of Cory's Shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea) it was argued that the cost of forming the egg is less than 0.5% of total costs of repro- duction and therefore not adequate in ex- plaining the long pre-laying absence of the females; instead it was suggested that, since they are more at home at sea than on land and already mated, they prefer to stay out at sea until egg-laying (Jouanin etal., 2001). As regards the fulmars, the fact that non-breed- ers also leave the colony for a period of time prior to the commencement of egg-laying seems to support the notion that the pre- laying exodus may not entirely be a matter
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.