Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2009, Page 106

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2009, Page 106
104 YEAR-ROUND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE OF INDIVIDUAL NEST-SITE ATTENDANCE OF NORTHERN FULMARS IN THE FAROE ISLANDS copulations were recorded at effectively all hours (between 02 and 23 hrs), hence not only during daylight. Besides there was no peak in frequency but a considerable varia- tion between the pairs with regard to fre- quency and days between first and last cop- ulation as well as total number of inseminations (Table 6). In all cases at least one of the birds in the pair departed for a pre-laying exodus shortly after the last cop- ulation and all but two of the pairs laid eggs upon the return to the nest-site 3-4 weeks later. The Northern Fulmar, like Leach's Storm-petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa), Horned Puffin (Fratercula corniculata) and probably some other pelagic seabirds, have sperm-storage glands which allows the part- ners to be separated for weeks (Hatch, 1983). It is believed that fertilization occurs within a few days prior to laying and it is suggested that the probability of paternity is deter- mined by the frequency and timing of in- seminations due to physiological constraints (Hunter, 1998). Female fulmars engage in extra-pair copulations (EPCs) but the extra- pair paternity appears to be < 5% (Hatch, 1987a; Hunter et al„ 1992; Hunter, 1998). We did not record any EPCs, possibly because of the small sample size and too few individu- ally marked birds. A pre-laying exodus is a common feature to most procellariids, including the North- ern Fulmar (see Introduction); though with some intra- and interspecific variation with regard to length in time and sex-biased par- ticipation (Warham, 1990, Brooke, 1990; Mallory and Forbes, 2007). In our study colony the exodus was more noticeable in 2006, when fewer birds occupied the moni- tored nest-sites in May than at correspon- ding time in 2007 (Fig. 1). However, this dif- ference is attributable to nest-site no. 2 in May 2007 when one of the birds was present all the time, but when these data are ex- cluded in the analysis the exodus is equally pronounced as in 2006. This also exemplifies the great between-nest variation in atten- dance in May. While the length of the pre- laying exodus ranged from 21 to 32 days the number of days when a given site was visiting during that period ranged from 1 to 25 days (Table 7). In two of three cases when ringed birds were involved it was the male that stayed behind and more or less regularly at- tended the nest-site, which is consistent with previous studies of the species and some other procellariids (Dunnet et al„ 1963; Hatch, 1983; Brooke, 1990). This sex-biased exodus is often discussed in terms of the fe- males' need to build up substantial food re- serves to be able to form the relatively large egg (Lack, 1966) and to participate in the in- cubation duties, whereas the males need to prepare for the first stints of incubation and to endure the long spells of fasting (Warham, 1990; Mallory and Forbes, 2007). In a study of Cory's Shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea) it was argued that the cost of forming the egg is less than 0.5% of total costs of repro- duction and therefore not adequate in ex- plaining the long pre-laying absence of the females; instead it was suggested that, since they are more at home at sea than on land and already mated, they prefer to stay out at sea until egg-laying (Jouanin etal., 2001). As regards the fulmars, the fact that non-breed- ers also leave the colony for a period of time prior to the commencement of egg-laying seems to support the notion that the pre- laying exodus may not entirely be a matter
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.