Læknablaðið

Ukioqatigiit

Læknablaðið - 15.02.1996, Qupperneq 32

Læknablaðið - 15.02.1996, Qupperneq 32
138 LÆKNABLAÐIÐ 1996; 82 DNA flæðigreining eykur nákvæmni við mat á horfum sjúklinga með brjóstakrabbamein Sunna Guölaugsdóttir121, Helgi Sigurðsson1’, Bjarni A. Agnarsson3’, Jón G. Jónasson31, Sigrún Krist- jánsdóttir31, Guðjón Baldursson1', Sigurður Björnsson1,4’, Þórarinn Sveinsson11, Valgarður Egilsson31 Guðlaugsdóttir S, Sigurðsson H, Agnarsson BA, Jónasson JG, Kristjánsdóttir S, Baldursson G, Björnsson S, Sveinsson Þ, Egilsson V DNA flow cytometry is a useful prognostic guide in the trcatment of breast cancer Læknablaðið 1995; 81: 138—47 It is widely agreed that the presence or absence of axillary lymph-node involvement (N) is the most reliable predictor of relapse or survival in breast cancer, together with tumor size (T) and the pres- ence or absence of distant metastasis (M). These prognostic factors are the cornerstones of the TNM staging system. The aim of the present study was to ascertain, in all patients diagnosed with invasive primary breast cancer in Iceland during the years 1981-84 (n=347), whether flow cytometric DNA analysis of ploidy status and fraction of cells in the S-phase contribute prognostic information, addi- tional to that obtained with TNM staging variables. Paraffin fixed tumor material was available from 340 patients (98%) and DNA ploidy and S-phase frac- tion was assessed with flow cytometry. DNA ploidy could be analysed in 98% of tumor samples (n=334), of which 114 (34%) were diploid and 220 (66%) non-diploid. S-phase fraction could be ana- lysed in 97% of the tumor samples (n=329), the median S-phase value was 7.0%, and was higher in non-diploid than diploid tumors (p<0.0001, 9.3% vs. 2.7%). Median duration of patient follow-up was 7.5 years. The disease-free survival at that point of time was 15% higher in patients with diploid tumors than non-diploid ones (p=0.004, 69% vs 54%). Similar survival comparison in relation to S-phase fraction Frá '’krabbameinslækningadeild Landspítalans, 2,lyfjadeild Borgarspítalans, 3,Rannsóknastofu Háskólans í meina- fræði, 4)lyfjadeild Landakotsspítala. Fyrirspurnir og bréfa- skipti: Helgi Sigurðsson, krabbameinslækningadeild Landspítalans, 101 Reykjavík. was 30% when the median S-phase value was used as cut-off point (p<0.0001, S-phase<7.0% being 74% vs. S-phase >7.0% being 44%). Multivariate analyses with regard to breast cancer survival and disease-free survival, which included both ploidy status and S-phase categories adjusting for age, tumor size and lymph node involvement, showed the S-phase value categories to be inde- pendent prognostic variables (p<0.0001). Patients with high S-phase tumors had a three-fold higher risk of recurrence than patients with low S-phase tumors. Ploidy status was not an independent prog- nostic variable, if however the S-phase categories were excluded from analysis, ploidy status was on the borderline of being an independent variable (p=0.09). In node-negative patients the S-phase fraction was the only useful variable in determining prognosis. We conclude that the S-phase value is a useful prog- nostic guide for the clinician and will be used for this purpose in the treatment of breast cancer in Iceland. Ágrip TNM stigun er notuð við mat á horfum sjúk- linga með brjóstakrabbamein, en hún endur- speglar útbreiðslu sjúkdómsins við greiningu, það er æxlisstærð (T), eitlameinvörp (N) og fjarmeinvörp (M). Tilgangur rannsóknarinnar var að athuga hvort auka mætti nákvæmni við mat á horfum sjúklinga með brjóstakrabba- mein með því að bæta við TNM stigunina upp- lýsingum uni líffræðilega þætti, það er að segja DNA innihald æxlisfrumna og hlutfall þeirra í framleiðslufasa eða S-fasa. Rannsóknin tekur til allra kvenna sem greindust með ífarandi brjóstakrabbamein á Islandi á árunum 1981-84 (n=347). Frá 340 (98%) þeirra voru til formalín hert paraffín innsteypt vefjasýni, en DNA innihald þeirra og S-fasi voru metin með flæðigreini (flow cyto- meter).
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92

x

Læknablaðið

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.