Læknaneminn - 01.04.2016, Side 59

Læknaneminn - 01.04.2016, Side 59
Ri trý nt e fn i 59 4. Landon MB. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Seminars in perinatology 2010;34:267-71. 5. Hochler H, Yaffe H, Schwed P, Mankuta D. Safety of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grandmultiparous women. Obstetrics and gynecology 2014;123:304-8. 6. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:1279-95. 7. Birgisdóttir BT, Þórkelsson Þ, Bjarnadóttir RI, Harðardóttir H. Fæðing eftir fyrri fæðingu með keisaraskurði. Læknablaðið 2008;94:591- 7. 8. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2007;110:801-7. 9. Guiliano M, Closset E, Therby D, LeGoueff F, Deruelle P, Subtil D. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2014;179:130-4. 10. Perez-Adan M, Alvarez-Silvares E, Garcia- Lavandeira S, Vilouta-Romero M, Doval- Conde JL. [Complete uterine ruptures]. Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico 2013;81:716-26. 11. Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine Rupture: A Seven Year Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine 2016;41:45-9. 12. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence report/technology assessment 2010:1-397. 13. Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, Florian A, Dreyfus M. [Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery]. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction 2012;41:708- 26. 14. Mirza FG, Gaddipati S. Obstetric emergencies. Seminars in perinatology 2009;33:97-103. 15. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstetrics and gynecology 2012;120:1332-7. 16. Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2014;211:453-60. 17. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;116:43-50. 18. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013;12:CD004224. 19. Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2010;117:5-19. 20. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;34:85-9. 21. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Post-cesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor. Obstetrics and gynecology 2003;101:136-9. 22. Kiran TS, Chui YK, Bethel J, Bhal PS. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates? European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2006;126:68-71. 23. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Trial of labor after 40 weeks’ gestation in women with prior cesarean. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001;97:391-3. 24. Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, et al. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:338-43. 25. Valentin L. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2013;27:285-95. 26. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2002;99:585-8. 27. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:1003-6. 28. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001;97:175-7. 29. Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, Sheiner E. The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2015;292:799-803. 30. Kelly BA, Bright P, Mackenzie IZ. Does the surgical approach used for myomectomy influence the morbidity in subsequent pregnancy? Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;28:77-81. 31. Kim MS, Uhm YK, Kim JY, Jee BC, Kim YB. Obstetric outcomes after uterine myomectomy: Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach. Obstetrics & gynecology science 2013;56:375-81. 32. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2015;291:273-80. 33. Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Rupture of the scarred uterus. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2007;86:572-8. 34. McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Guise JM. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112:1007-15. 35. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. The New England journal of medicine 2001;345:3-8. 36. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;116:450-63. 37. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1999;181:882-6. 38. Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008;199:32 e1-5. 39. Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, et al. Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet 2015;28:386-91. 40. Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Incerti M, Bonardi C, Regalia AL. Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet 2006;19:471-5. 41. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Grivell RM, Deussen AR. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014;12:CD004906. 42. Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, Gauthier R, Platt RW. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001;184:620-4. 43. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012;207:210 e1-6.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144

x

Læknaneminn

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknaneminn
https://timarit.is/publication/1885

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.