Læknaneminn - 01.04.2016, Page 59

Læknaneminn - 01.04.2016, Page 59
Ri trý nt e fn i 59 4. Landon MB. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Seminars in perinatology 2010;34:267-71. 5. Hochler H, Yaffe H, Schwed P, Mankuta D. Safety of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grandmultiparous women. Obstetrics and gynecology 2014;123:304-8. 6. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:1279-95. 7. Birgisdóttir BT, Þórkelsson Þ, Bjarnadóttir RI, Harðardóttir H. Fæðing eftir fyrri fæðingu með keisaraskurði. Læknablaðið 2008;94:591- 7. 8. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2007;110:801-7. 9. Guiliano M, Closset E, Therby D, LeGoueff F, Deruelle P, Subtil D. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2014;179:130-4. 10. Perez-Adan M, Alvarez-Silvares E, Garcia- Lavandeira S, Vilouta-Romero M, Doval- Conde JL. [Complete uterine ruptures]. Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico 2013;81:716-26. 11. Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine Rupture: A Seven Year Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine 2016;41:45-9. 12. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence report/technology assessment 2010:1-397. 13. Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, Florian A, Dreyfus M. [Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery]. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction 2012;41:708- 26. 14. Mirza FG, Gaddipati S. Obstetric emergencies. Seminars in perinatology 2009;33:97-103. 15. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstetrics and gynecology 2012;120:1332-7. 16. Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2014;211:453-60. 17. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;116:43-50. 18. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013;12:CD004224. 19. Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2010;117:5-19. 20. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;34:85-9. 21. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Post-cesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor. Obstetrics and gynecology 2003;101:136-9. 22. Kiran TS, Chui YK, Bethel J, Bhal PS. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates? European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2006;126:68-71. 23. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Trial of labor after 40 weeks’ gestation in women with prior cesarean. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001;97:391-3. 24. Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, et al. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:338-43. 25. Valentin L. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2013;27:285-95. 26. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2002;99:585-8. 27. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;115:1003-6. 28. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001;97:175-7. 29. Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, Sheiner E. The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2015;292:799-803. 30. Kelly BA, Bright P, Mackenzie IZ. Does the surgical approach used for myomectomy influence the morbidity in subsequent pregnancy? Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;28:77-81. 31. Kim MS, Uhm YK, Kim JY, Jee BC, Kim YB. Obstetric outcomes after uterine myomectomy: Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach. Obstetrics & gynecology science 2013;56:375-81. 32. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2015;291:273-80. 33. Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Rupture of the scarred uterus. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2007;86:572-8. 34. McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Guise JM. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112:1007-15. 35. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. The New England journal of medicine 2001;345:3-8. 36. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010;116:450-63. 37. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1999;181:882-6. 38. Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008;199:32 e1-5. 39. Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, et al. Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet 2015;28:386-91. 40. Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Incerti M, Bonardi C, Regalia AL. Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet 2006;19:471-5. 41. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Grivell RM, Deussen AR. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014;12:CD004906. 42. Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, Gauthier R, Platt RW. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001;184:620-4. 43. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012;207:210 e1-6.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144

x

Læknaneminn

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Læknaneminn
https://timarit.is/publication/1885

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.