Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Årgang

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1982, Side 150

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1982, Side 150
DAGUERREOTÝPUR Á ÍSLANDl 153 photographs are referred to there as sólmyndir (sunpictures). Later that name was only applied to direct positives, such as daguerreotypes and ambrotypes, and Ijósmyndir (light pictures) became the standard term for photographs on paper. When the first Icelandic photographer Helgi Sigurðsson (1815—1888) returned to Iceland from Copenhagen in 1846, very few Icelanders had even seen a photograph. In fact the social develop- ment in Iceland differed fundamentally from its European counterparts. Urbanisation had scarcely begun in 1850. Reykjavík had 639 inhabitants in 1835, 1149 in 1850 and 1444 in 1860, Akureyri, the second largest town, had 56 inhabitants in 1835, 187 in 1850 and 218 in 1862, and ísafjörður, the third largest town, had 37 inhabitants in 1835, 90 in 1850 and 218 in 1860. All fundamental changes in class structure went hand in hand with the urbanisation and industrialisation of the country. Even though farmers pursued fishing or various crafts, these remained a side line. Furthermore there was no tradition for portraiture in lceland, as in Europe, when photography was first introduced. A few individuals had painted portraits, some of which had studied art, but none of them could make a living out of it. The nation was living at a subsistence level and people could simply not afford to have their picture painted or taken. When first introduced in lceland photography thus could not build on a tradition in portraiture but had to create that tradition by itself. The aforenamed Helgi had learned to take daguerreotypes in Copenhagen after studying there, among other, drawing at Kunstakademiet. Information on Helgi’s career as a photographer is limited to two comic accounts of mishaps when he was photographing. It is therefore unknown to what extent he practised the trade. No original daguerreotype taken by him exists but it is plausible that a photograph of his father (fig. 3) is a copy of an original taken by Helgi. Helgi was a farmer in Western Iceland till 1866 when he became a minister, a position he held till 1883. The second lcelandic photographer was Siggeir Pálsson (1815—1866). Written accounts on his career as a photographer are richer than in most cases due to the survival of two private archives containing a number of letters from him. Siggeir learned to take daguerreotypes in Oslo while working as an assistant to merchants trading in Iceland during the winter 1856—57. His teacher was Carl Christian Wischmann. One finds it surprising that Siggeir chose to learn to take daguerreotypes at a time when other simpler and cheaper photographic methods were becoming dominant in the field. Siggeir seems mainly to have worked in the village Eskifjörður in Eastern Iceland. There he took 5 daguerreotypes in 1857 after his return from Oslo and he continued to take a few pictures the following summers. Various difficulties such as keeping the materials protected from dampness were a problem to him as well as the purchase of new materials from Copenhagen. According to his own account there were few people interested in having their picture taken. The transport of all the equipment from one place to another proved such a hind- rance that it was hardly worth the trouble for taking just one picture at each farm. ln 1862 Siggeir became a minister, a position he held until his death in 1866. By the time Siggeir gave up his career as a photographer in 1861 the trade was taking a new turn for there were no less than three photographers working in Reykjavík during the summer of that year.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.