Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.12.1984, Qupperneq 42

Jökull - 01.12.1984, Qupperneq 42
ppm (see Ellis and Mahon 1977) and in Icelandic geothermal waters (NEA data and Table 3) only saline or C02- waters have magnesium concentra- tions exceeding 0.1 ppm. We consider the com- parison with low-temperature C02-water from Lýsuhóll (40-60 °C, 20 ppm Mg) as done by Steinthórsson and Óskarsson (1983) to be mis- leading. Even carbonate-water from high temper- ature areas would have considerably lower Mg content as the solubility of Mg minerals increases with lower temperatures. Therefore, we do not believe that mixing of meltwater and geothermal water can explain the observed magnesium con- centration in jökulhlaups. We suggest instead the interaction between water and highly reactive volcanic glass to be a more likely explanation of the observed Mg concentrations in the water from Skeidará during jökulhlaups. The magne- sium was leached from the volcanic glass at temperatures not exceeding 40 °C, and the water has not been exposed to higher temperatures in the lake for any length of time. The Na/K ratio has been successfully used as a thermometer of geothermal water by many geochemists (Ellis 1979, Fournier 1981, Arnórs- son et al. 1983). However, the use of the Na/K geothermometer for highly diluted geothermal water is generally considered questionable (see Ellis 1979, Fournier 1981, and Benjamin et al. 1983). For waters originally at temperatures below 100 °C it is applicable only in special cases (Kristmannsdóttir and Johnsen 1982, Krist- mannsdóttir 1983). Steinthórsson and Óskarsson (1983) suggested that the Na/K ratio of water from jökulhlaups could be used to calculate the reservoir temperature in the Grímsvötn geoth- ermal system. The mean value of the Na/K ratio in samples from the jökulhlaup in February 1982 was 24±2 (standard deviation), in December 1983 24±6 and in 1976 the ratio was 19±4. Sam- ples of normal water in Skeidará in 1982 and 1983 show a mean value of 24 ±6 for the Na/K ratio. The variations of this ratio are greater from one month to another in 1982 and 1983 than between the jökulhlaups in 1976 and 1983. According to Steinthórsson and Óskarsson (1983) this ratio was 20 in samples from the jökulhlaup in 1982, 50 in samples from the jökulhlaup in 1972 but it was 40 in their „normal” water (see their table 3, p. 78). For comparison, the average ratio of Na/K in the rivers in SW-Iceland ranged from 17 to 40 in the years 1972/1973 (Ármannsson et al. 1972, Rist 1974) and the variation in samples from a single river was in the same range. In the river Súla the Na/K ratio in normal water varies from 14 to 65 and from 17 to 45 in the river Djúpá. In light of the described circumstances the use of a Na/K geothermometer on water in the jökulhlaups from Grímsvötn (Steinthórsson and Óskarsson 1983) appears questionable. Substances whose concentrations are not changed by reactions in the lake. Some substances are not expected to have leached out of basaltic glass in the Grímsvötn lake. First because the glass does not contain the substances in appreciable quantities. This applies for carbonate, fluoride and chloride. Secondly, the substances are poorly soluble in cold water. That applies for silica. Carbonate is not a major component of basal- tic glass and thus would not be leached in the lake. The concentration of total carbonate in the jökulhlaups is the result of plain mixing of the geothermal component and the meltwater. The concentration of carbonate (as C02) in normal river water is 10-30 mg/kg as shown in Fig. 8. The concentration for the meltwater component in Grímsvötn is probably lower and an estimate of 20 mg/kg (as C02) seems to be an upper limit. It is difficult to estimate the carbonate concentra- tion of the geothermal component. This con- centration is variable from one high-temperature geothermal area to another as shown in Table 3. The concentration of C1 and F cannot be signi- ficantly affected by water/rock interaction in the lake but may be slightly changed by increased volcanic activity as HCl and HF are components in volcanic gases. Silica is poorly soluble in cold water. Hence, no significant leaching is expected in the lake. Therefore, the observed silica concentration of the jökulhlaups reflects the original concentra- tion of the fluid that enters the lake. The discus- sion of silica will be continued separately in the next section. GEOTHERMAL MASS FRACTION AND THE BALANCES OF MASS AND ENERGY. Energy and mass balance equations have so far been used to describe the heat and mass flow in the Grímsvötn area (Björnsson 1974, 1983). Now 40 JÖKULL 34. ÁR
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.