Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1985, Síða 50

Jökull - 01.12.1985, Síða 50
of lateral features associated with subglacial water flow. One of the major problems in interpreting landscape history in Iceland is that while the evidence of large- scale, sub-continental glaciation is clear all over Ice- land, the traces of its disappearance are few and so small-scale that they seem to bear no relationship even to stadial glaciation. A similar situation was apparent during an examin- ation of the Borgarfjörður-Mýrar area of W Iceland, (Ashwell, 1975), and it was suggested there that the main late-Glacial process had beenengiacial and subgla- cial water flow. This and the lack of end moraines are readily explicable when viewed in terms of Iceland’s volcanic and glacial history. Rifting and volcanism have been taking place in Iceland since the Tertiary. The presence of the Pleis- tocene ice cover modified the volcanic processes and the resulting structures, formed subglacially, (Kjartansson 1943), were distinctive landscape features such as table- mountains, (van Bemmelen and Rutten 1955), known collectively as the Móberg formation. Volcanic activity continues today under Vatnajökull, Mýrdalsjökull, and, sporadically, under Öraefajökull. The result of this activity has been a complete modifica- tion of the coastline of S Iceland for a length of some 130 km in the approximately 1100 years of historical time, (Thorarinsson, 1974) by mainly volcanic jökul- hlaups. In the case of the Grímsvötn caldera under Vatnajökull it has been estimated, (Björnsson, 1983), that some 10% of the total inflow of magma to the area reaches the glacier base, that is, about 5x 106m3yr_1, and about 3%, that is 1.5xl06m3yr"1, is erupted into the glacier as tephra, on average in recent time. The volume of the resulting floods, carrying Iarge amounts of solid material of volcanic origin, is of the order of several cubic kilometres. In the case of Katla, under Mýrdals- jökull, Jónsson (1982) suggests that the process has been a volcanoglacial debris flow on occasions, rather than a jökulhlaup, because some 80% of the total volume of up to ^xlO^m^s""1 at peak flow may be of solid material. It must be assumed that similar processes have occur- red relatively frequently on a geological timescale throughout the later Pleistocene and Holocene, and that melting must have occurred whether the overlying ice was Polar or Temperate since present theory sug- gests that the pillow-lavas forming the core of the Móberg structures were extruded into water, (van Bemmelen and Rutten, 1955; Saemundsson, 1979). Since it is difficult to estimate the rate at which the Móberg structures were built up there would be little point in trying to calculate the amount of water involved or the distance which it could have travelled to escape under the ice. It can be suggested, however, that in the case of the largest structures water could have reached the margins of the ice by flow along existing channels, mainly pre-Glacial river valleys. Where these valleys did not follow the most direct escape routes, normally following the direction of ice surface slope and there- fore of the flow of ice, (Shreve, 1972), to deeper waters beyond the ice edge on the continental shelf, water would flow sub-glacially across ridges or englacially across valleys to maintain the direct flow. There is no theoretical reason why such flow is not possible, (Röth- lisberger, 1972), especially when the source is high up on a plateau providing sufficient head for considerable upward or downward movement. Under these condi- tions esker formation can be expected in the lower parts of rising flows, (Shreve, 1972). The process would have accelerated as ice thickness decreased and ice margins retreated to reduce flow distances. Once these margins were established on land the existence of end-moraines in valleys would be short because of the periodical jökulhlaups and they would be more likely to have survived on higher ground. The Snaefell massif to the SW has clearly been the source of both water and deposited material for Fljóts- dalur and lower Jökuldalur. The volume of volcanic material in the system, resting on a basement of Terti- ary rocks at about 650 m elevation, rising to 1833 m on Snaefell itself and covering an area of 20x12 km, is enormous and the corresponding amount of rock and water released during the sub-glacial building process must have been very large, with sufficient head to be capable of substantial transport and erosion until either the volcanic centre became extinct or the ice cover disappeared. In support of this theory it should be noted that, apart from a thin covering of unsorted material covering the widespread eskers and perhaps representing the final downwasting of ice, neither of the deposits of unsorted material in Fljótsdalur and the lower part of Jökuldalur is found in the main valley. The deposits N of Skriðu- klaustur are marginal to the valley and also show some signs of layering: Only the material on Fellaheiði, now being cut by Rangá, is true moraine or drift, filling a depression between Sandvatn stóra and Rangárhnjúkur and well away from any water flow in the main valleys. It appears that this upland area must have been covered by an ice tongue under pressure, with water from the S following its NW edge through the Tröllagjót notch into Jökuldalur, and round its E edge past Rangárhnjúkur. 48 JÖKULL 35. ÁR
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116
Síða 117
Síða 118
Síða 119
Síða 120
Síða 121
Síða 122
Síða 123
Síða 124
Síða 125
Síða 126
Síða 127
Síða 128
Síða 129
Síða 130
Síða 131
Síða 132
Síða 133
Síða 134
Síða 135
Síða 136
Síða 137
Síða 138
Síða 139
Síða 140
Síða 141
Síða 142
Síða 143
Síða 144
Síða 145
Síða 146
Síða 147
Síða 148
Síða 149
Síða 150
Síða 151
Síða 152
Síða 153
Síða 154
Síða 155
Síða 156
Síða 157
Síða 158
Síða 159
Síða 160
Síða 161
Síða 162
Síða 163
Síða 164

x

Jökull

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.