Orð og tunga - 01.06.2011, Qupperneq 44

34
Orð og tunga
51. Stockholm: Meddelanden frán Institutionen för nordiska sprák vid
Stockholms universitet.
Sandoy, Helge. 2003. Sprákendringar med eller utan kontakt i Vest-Norden?
I: Kristján Árnason (ed.): Útnorður. West Nordic standardization and varia-
tion, s. 81-109. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics - University of Iceland
Press.
Spurkland, Terje. 2006. From Tune to Eggja - the ontology of language chan-
ge. I: Marie Stoklund et al. (eds). Runes and their Secrets, s. 333-345. Co-
penhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Trask, R.T. 2000. The Dictionary ofHistorical and Comparative Linguistics. Edin-
burg: University Press.
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. Om the role of dialect contact and interdialect in lingu-
istic change. I: Fisiak, Jacek (ed.). Historical Dialectology, s. 547-563. Berlin/
New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ulvestad, Bjame. 1964. Melding av Chapman, Kenneth G. 1962. Language 40
s. 601-604
Nokkelord
konsonantutvikling, fonologisk konspirasjon, sonoritet, plosiver, segmentasjon, sor-
vestnorsk, hyperdialektisme - naboopposisjon, desonorisering, preaspirasjon, harð-
mæli/linmæli, sprákkontakt
Keywords
consonant change, historical conspiracy, sonority, plosives, segmentation, South West
Norwegian, hyperdialectism - neighbor opposition, desonorization, preaspiration,
harðmæli/linmæli, language contact
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to discuss some conspicuous parallel consonant de-
velopments between Icelandic (and for the most part also Faroese) and South West
Norwegian dialects in the light of a hypothesis set forth by Kristján Arnason (1990)
that these common innovations might be due to what he calls "a conspiracy for a stop
in the rhyme". This conspiracy is then what "explains" several cases where fricatives
and sonorants in post-vocalic position change into plosives (ch. 5): Some of these
changes may be very old - even Common Germanic (e.g. nð, Ið, ny > nd, Id, ng), the
younger ones, however, from late medieval times [e.g. rn, 11, nn > dn, dl, dn].
Particular attention is paid to the dialects in the area around the city of Bergen,
where some developments show influence from the urban vernacular (e.g. assimila-
tions like mb, nd > mm, nn), whereas other developments are in the same vein as in the
rural South West Norwegian dialects, in some cases even extending the tendencies
even further (e.g. mm > bm, which is restricted to the area around Bergen). These