Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Volume

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1982, Page 84

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1982, Page 84
88 ÁRBÓK FORNLEIFAFÉLAGSINS The illustrations on fol. lOr depict tha Annunciation, the Nativity, the Crucifixion and the Re- surrection. The Annunciation seems to have been copied from fol. lv of Skb, although the bowl of flowers between the Virgin Mary and the Angel is missing in De la Gardie 9, and it is evident that various changes have been made to fol. lv over the course of time. Of the four depictions of the Annunciation in Skb, two are without bowls of flowers. The depiction of the Nativity seems to have been copied from an illustration on fol. 14r in Skb, although there are some discrepancies which might well be the result of the Skb illustration’s having been tampered with after the De la Gardie illustration was drawn. An original for the Crucifixion is not to be found in Skb in its present state, since it contains only a representation of the Crucifixion with the two thieves (fol. 14v). We may assume, however, that the Crucifixion also derives from Skb since all four illustrations concerned clearly form a series. Other representations of the Crucifixion were probably originally to be found in Skb, as well as other illustrations from the life of Christ which have since been lost; this is clear from the fact that the Nativity and the Passion are well represented while other scenes receive less attention or none at all. Many details in the Crucifixion in De la Gardie are reminiscent of similar illustrations of the Skagafjörður school, such as the hair, the crown of thorns, the outlines of the arms and body, the attitude of the feet, the large nails or arrows, and the open eyes of Christ. The representation of the Resurrection in De la Gardie seems to have been modelled on fol. 2r of Skb, although it depicts only one angel on the tomb instead of Skb’s two; and only two guards instead of four. There is also an incomplete illustration of the Resurrection on fol. 17r of Skb, in which the soldiers are missing. Two illustrations are to be found on fol. lOv of De la Gardie. The upper one depicts the Ascension, and the lower Pentecost (Whitsun), with the Holy Ghost descending upon the apostles in the likeness of a white dove. These were the illustrations which originally prompted me to set these remarks down, for this was the first time I had come across an Icelandic depiction of the Ascension, ‘the disappearing Christ’, modelled on an English original, or the Holy Ghost descending upon the Apostles. As I have noted elsewhere several of the illustrations in Skb are of English origin. Peter and Paul can be recognized amongst the apostles in the lower picture, with the Virgin Mary between them. It is interesting to note, in connection with this illustration, that on fol. llv in Skb there is an illustration bearing the superscription: “This is Whitsun as ye may see.” The scribe is of course mistaken, for instead of Whitsun the illustration depicts five apostles with their symbols, and a donor, providing a clear example of the overreliance placed on textual study and paleography in assigning a date to the Sketchbook. Harry Fett and Kr. Kálund assign Skb to the 15th century with the exception of a few leaves. Kálund, like Stefán Karlsson, appears to rely exclusively on the handwriting in his dating of the manuscript. Björn Th. Björnsson relies on stylistic considerations to arrive at a date of 1420—1440, although he appears also to take handwriting into consideration since he refers to the prayer on fol. 20v as ‘the illustrator’s prayer’. Thus the handwriting appears often to have been considered a more reliable indication of date than the pictures themselves, although it is clear that various hands from various periods appear in the book, adding comments or inscriptions to the illustrations, with some items understood, others misunderstood; sometimes the writers have even gone so far as to erase pictures in order to make room for their comments. Working from stylistic evidence, on the other hand, I have dated the main sources of the illustrations to the middle of the 14th century; some may even be earlier. The Sketchbook is a model book of illustrations, not handwriting, and it would seem to me quite feasible to suppose that it originally contained no text at all. The De la Gardie 9 manuscript, said by Jón Sigurðsson to have been written for the Rev.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.