Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.10.2001, Qupperneq 50

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.10.2001, Qupperneq 50
SIÐFRÆÐI FÓSTURGREININGAR öllum konum, og sem ekki er ætlað að koma í stað ómskoðunar við 18-19 vikna meðgöngu, öðlist hratt álíka sess - er það stefna sem við viljum taka? Ifmen could learnfrom history, what lessons itmight teach us! But passion and party blind our eyes, and the light which experience gives us is a lantern on the stern, which shines only on the waves behind us Samuel Taylor Coleridge Helmildir 1. Oakley A. Essays on women, medicine & health. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.; 1993. Upprunalega birt sem grein: The history of ultrasonography in obstetrics. Birth 1986 Dec; 13 Suppl: 5-10 suppl. 2. Press N, Browner C. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 979-89. 3. McKinlay J. From “Promising report” to “Standard proce- dure”: Seven stages in the career of a medical Innovation. Technology and the future of health care. Milbank Reader 8. The MIT press 1982: 233-70. 4. Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, et al. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a syste- matic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: i-vi, 1-193. 5. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. 6. Geirsson RT. Leiðbeiningar um ómskoðun á meðgöngu. Læknablaðið 2000; 86: 779-81. 7. Kilby MD. Prenatal diagnosis: the way ahead? Hosp Med 1998;59:752-3. 8. Norges forskningsrád. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. Kon- sensuskonferanse. Oslo: Rapport nr. 9 fra Komitéen for medisinsk teknologivurdering; 1995. 9. Harðardóttir H. Omskoðun fósturs við 11-13 vikur, hnakka- þykktarmæling og líkindamat með tilliti til litningagalla og hjartagalla. Læknablaðið 2001; 87: 415-21. 10. Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Munk M, Svendsen L, Teisner L. Ultra- sound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and accep- tances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 383-6. 11. Santalahti P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Helenius H, Ryynanen M. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening? Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:153-65. 12. Chandler M, Smith A. Prenatal screening and women’s per- ception of infant disabilty: a Sophie’s Choice for every mother. Nurslnq 1998; 5:71-6. 13. Santalahti P, Hemminki E, Lattikka A-M, Ryynanen M. Women's decision-making in prenatal screening. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46:1067-76. 14. Jörgensen FS. Gravide kvinders holdning til prenatal screen- ing. Ugeskr Læger 1996; 158: 5447-52. 15. Santalahti P. Prenatal screening in Finland, availability and women's decision making and experiences. Research report 94. Finland: STAKES; 1998. 16. Tincello DG, Jones ME. Second trimester fetal abnormality scans: do women know the reasons why they are done? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 1998; 8: 438-40. 17. Waldenström U. Screena inte gravida men informera alla. Lákartidningen 1995; 92: 2017-8. 18. Waldenström U. Ultraljud under graviditet. Lákartidningen 1995; 92:2580-2. 19. Whitfield S, Harkey-Pruitt R, Smart P, Dooley RL. Routine use of ultrasound during pregnancy. Nurse Pract 1998; 23: 60- 7L 20. Árnason V. Siðfræði lífs og dauða. Reykjavík: Háskóli íslands, Rannsóknastofnun í siðfræði; 1993. 21. Symon A. Midwives and professional status. Br J Midwifery 1996; 4: 543-50. 22. Howsam RB, Corrigan DC, Denemark GW, Nash RJ. Edu- cating a profession. Report of the Bicentennial Commission on Education for the Profession of Teaching of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington: AACTE; 1985. 23. Hemminki E, Toiviainen H, Santalahti P. Views of Finnish doctors on fetal screening Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 656-62. 24. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients; is the information good enough? BMJ 1999; 318:318- 22. 25. Sadler M. Serum screening for Down's syndrome: how much do health professionals know? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:176-9. 26. Press N, Browner C. Autonomy and responsibility. Informed consent for prenatal testing. Hastings Center Report 1995; May-June: 9-12. 27. Thornton TG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Vail A. A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. BMJ 1995; 311:1127-30. 50 Læknablaðið 2001/87/Fylgirit 42
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.