Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.10.2001, Blaðsíða 50

SIÐFRÆÐI FÓSTURGREININGAR
öllum konum, og sem ekki er ætlað að koma í stað
ómskoðunar við 18-19 vikna meðgöngu, öðlist hratt
álíka sess - er það stefna sem við viljum taka?
Ifmen could learnfrom history, what lessons itmight
teach us!
But passion and party blind our eyes, and the light
which experience gives us is a lantern on the stern,
which shines only on the waves behind us
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Helmildir
1. Oakley A. Essays on women, medicine & health. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press Ltd.; 1993. Upprunalega birt sem
grein: The history of ultrasonography in obstetrics. Birth 1986
Dec; 13 Suppl: 5-10 suppl.
2. Press N, Browner C. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis.
Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 979-89.
3. McKinlay J. From “Promising report” to “Standard proce-
dure”: Seven stages in the career of a medical Innovation.
Technology and the future of health care. Milbank Reader 8.
The MIT press 1982: 233-70.
4. Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J,
Roberts T, et al. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a syste-
matic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness
and women's views. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: i-vi, 1-193.
5. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L,
Hodnett E, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and
childbirth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
6. Geirsson RT. Leiðbeiningar um ómskoðun á meðgöngu.
Læknablaðið 2000; 86: 779-81.
7. Kilby MD. Prenatal diagnosis: the way ahead? Hosp Med
1998;59:752-3.
8. Norges forskningsrád. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. Kon-
sensuskonferanse. Oslo: Rapport nr. 9 fra Komitéen for
medisinsk teknologivurdering; 1995.
9. Harðardóttir H. Omskoðun fósturs við 11-13 vikur, hnakka-
þykktarmæling og líkindamat með tilliti til litningagalla og
hjartagalla. Læknablaðið 2001; 87: 415-21.
10. Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Munk M, Svendsen L, Teisner L. Ultra-
sound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's
background knowledge, expectations, experiences and accep-
tances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 383-6.
11. Santalahti P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Helenius H, Ryynanen
M. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal
screening? Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:153-65.
12. Chandler M, Smith A. Prenatal screening and women’s per-
ception of infant disabilty: a Sophie’s Choice for every mother.
Nurslnq 1998; 5:71-6.
13. Santalahti P, Hemminki E, Lattikka A-M, Ryynanen M.
Women's decision-making in prenatal screening. Soc Sci Med
1998; 46:1067-76.
14. Jörgensen FS. Gravide kvinders holdning til prenatal screen-
ing. Ugeskr Læger 1996; 158: 5447-52.
15. Santalahti P. Prenatal screening in Finland, availability and
women's decision making and experiences. Research report
94. Finland: STAKES; 1998.
16. Tincello DG, Jones ME. Second trimester fetal abnormality
scans: do women know the reasons why they are done?
MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 1998; 8: 438-40.
17. Waldenström U. Screena inte gravida men informera alla.
Lákartidningen 1995; 92: 2017-8.
18. Waldenström U. Ultraljud under graviditet. Lákartidningen
1995; 92:2580-2.
19. Whitfield S, Harkey-Pruitt R, Smart P, Dooley RL. Routine
use of ultrasound during pregnancy. Nurse Pract 1998; 23: 60-
7L
20. Árnason V. Siðfræði lífs og dauða. Reykjavík: Háskóli íslands,
Rannsóknastofnun í siðfræði; 1993.
21. Symon A. Midwives and professional status. Br J Midwifery
1996; 4: 543-50.
22. Howsam RB, Corrigan DC, Denemark GW, Nash RJ. Edu-
cating a profession. Report of the Bicentennial Commission
on Education for the Profession of Teaching of the American
Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington:
AACTE; 1985.
23. Hemminki E, Toiviainen H, Santalahti P. Views of Finnish
doctors on fetal screening Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107:
656-62.
24. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with
patients; is the information good enough? BMJ 1999; 318:318-
22.
25. Sadler M. Serum screening for Down's syndrome: how much
do health professionals know? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;
104:176-9.
26. Press N, Browner C. Autonomy and responsibility. Informed
consent for prenatal testing. Hastings Center Report 1995;
May-June: 9-12.
27. Thornton TG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Vail A. A randomised
trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal
testing. BMJ 1995; 311:1127-30.
50 Læknablaðið 2001/87/Fylgirit 42