Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 01.10.2001, Qupperneq 63

SIÐFRÆÐI FÓSTURGREININGAR
diagnosis of genetic variants. Issues in Law & Med 1998; 14:
165-202.
26. Lippman A. Prenatal genetic testing and screening: construc-
ting needs and reinforcing inequities. Am J Law Med 1991;
XVII (1-2): 15-50.
27. Press N, Browner CH. Risk, autonomy and responsibility.
Informed concent for prenatal testing. Hastings Center
Report 1995; 25/Suppl: S9-S12.
28. Tymstra T. The imperative character of medical technology
and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret”. Int J Tech-
nol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 207-13.
29. Cederholm M, Axelsson O, Sjödén P-O. Women's knowledge,
concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing
invasive procedures for prenatal karyotyping. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 267-72.
30. Oakley A. Essays on women, medicine and health. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press; 1993.
31. Marteau T, Drake H. Attributions for disability: the influence
of genetic testing. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40:1127-32.
32. Rothman BK. The tentative pregnancy. How amniocentesis
changes the experience of motherhood. New York: WW
Norton & Company; 1993.
33. Rapp R. Testing women, testing the fetus. The social impact of
amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge; 2000.
34. Weiss M. Conditional love: parents' attitudes toward handi-
capped children. Westport, Conn: Bergin and Garvey; 1994.
35. Copel JA, Bahado-Singh RO. Prenatal screening for Down's
syndrome - a search for the family s values. N Engl J Med
1999; 341:521-2.
36. Hubbard R. Eugenics and prenatal testing. Int J Health
Services 1988; 16:227-42.
37. Baillie C, Smith J, Hewison J, Mason G. Ultrasound screening
for fetal abnormality: women's reactions to false positive
results. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 377-94.
38. Weinans MJ, Huijsson AMG, Tymstra T, Gerrits MC, Beek-
huis JR, Mantingh A. How women deal with the results of
serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester
of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 705-8.
39. Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic. An archeology of medical
perception. New York: Vintage Books; 1994.
40. Mason G, Baillie C. Councelling should be provided before
parents are told of the presence of ultrasonic “soft markers” of
fetal abnormality. BMJ 1997; 315: 189-90.
41. Ettorre E. reproductive genetics, gender and the body: “Please
Doctor, may I have a normal baby?” Sociology 2000; 34: 403-
20.
42. Barker DJP. Fetal and infant origins of adult disease. London:
BMJ books; 1992.
43. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1-199.
44. Hansen D, Lou HC, Olsen J. Serious life events and congenital
malformations: a national study with complete follow-up.
Lancet 2000; 356: 875-80.
45. Carmichael SL, Shaw GM. Maternal life event stress and
congenital anomalies. Epidemiology 2000; 11:30-5.
46. Keller EF. The century of the gene. Cambridge Mass: Harvard
University Press; 2000.
47. O’Connor TG, Heron J, Golding J, Beveridge M, Glover V.
Maternal Antenatal Anxiety and Behavioural Problems in
Early Childhood. Br J Psychiatry. In press 2001.
48. White-van Mourik MCA, Connor JM, Ferguson-Smith MA.
The psychological sequelae of a second-trimester termination
of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:189-
204.
49. ten Have H. Medical technology assessment and ethics. Ambi-
valent relations. Hastings Center Report 1995; 25 (5): 13-9.
50. Kirkengen AL. Medisinen, postmodernismen og slutten pá
virkeligheten. Nytt norsk tidsskrift 1998 (3): 281-6.
51. ten Have H. Letters to Dr Frankenstein? Ethics and the new
reproductive technologies. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40:141-6.
52. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical
epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd ed.
Boston/NY/London: Little, Brown and Company; 1991.
53. Getz L. General practitioners and prenatal testing - follow the
experts or scrutinise the issue? Scand J Prim Health Care 2001;
19:145-7.
54. Ridsdale L. Evidence-based general practice. A critica!
reader. London: WB Saunders Company Ltd.; 1995.
55. Hall S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Psychological consequences
for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for
Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study. BMJ 2000;
320:407-12.
56. Rendtorff JD. Bioetik og ret. Kroppen mellem person og ting.
Köbenhavn: Gyldendal; 1999.
Læknablaðið 2001/87/Fylgirit 42 63