Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2011, Qupperneq 120

120
„Kannski erum við orðnar svo miklar strákastelpur að það haga sér allir eins“
Abbiss, J. (2008). Rethinking the problem of
gender and IT schooling: discourses in
literature. Gender and Education, 20, 153-
165.
Andersen, M. (2009). Thinking about women:
Sociological perspectives of sex and gender (8.
útgáfa). Boston: Pearson Education.
Auður Magndís Leiknisdóttir, Ásdís Aðal-
björg Arnalds og Friðrik H. Jónsson.
(2009). Staða og þróun jafnréttismála við Há-
skóla Íslands 2003-2007. Reykjavík: Félags-
vísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.
Baker, J. (2008). The ideology of choice. Over-
stating progress and hiding injustice in
the lives of young women: Findings from
a study in North Queensland, Australia.
Women´s Studies International Forum, 31,
53-64.
Baker, J. (2010). Great expectations and post-
feminist accountability: young women li-
ving up to the ‘successful girls’ discourse.
Gender and Education, 22, 1-15.
Baxter, J. (2002). A juggling act: A feminist
post-structuralist analysis of girls´and bo-
ys´talk in the secondary classroom. Gender
and Education, 14, 5-19.
Berglind Rós Magnúsdóttir. (2003). Orðræð-
ur um kyngervi, völd og virðingu í ung-
lingabekk. Óbirt M.A. ritgerð: Háskóli Ís-
lands, Félagsvísindadeild, Reykjavík. Sótt
5 júní 2011 af: http://www.jafnrettiiskol-
um.is/D10/_Files/Berglind%20Rós%20
Magnúsdóttir.PDF.
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science
careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?
Gender and Education, 17, 369-386.
Bogdan, R. C. og Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualita-
tive research in education: An introduction
to theory and methods (3. útgáfa). Massa-
chusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination.
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Brainard, S. G. og Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year
longitudinal study of undergraduate wo-
men in engineering and science. Journal of
Engineering Education, 87, 369-375.
Brandell, G. og Staberg, E. (2008). Mathema-
tics: a female, male and gender-neutral
domain? A study of attitudes among
students at secondary level. Gender and
Education, 20, 495-509.
Heimildaskrá
relations affect students’ daily lives and
their choice of field, and they contribute to
an atmosphere that is experienced as dis-
tasteful by many women. This may be dis-
couraging and a hindrance for those who
do not identify with the dominant mascu-
line stereotypes.
Discussion
Emphasis on individual choice, personal
preferences and interest have been used
to explain the low percentage of women
in the male-dominated fields. This type
of explanation ignores social forces that
influence our mindset and actions; hence,
the negative influence of cultural factors
in explaining women’s underrepresenta-
tion continue to be invisible and ignored.
The study has a practical and a theoretical
value. It contributes to our understanding
of the gendered social mechanisms that
reproduce gender bias in the natural sci-
ences.