Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2011, Side 99

99
Kyngervi raunvísinda: Námsval og aðstæður kvenna í hefðbundnum karlagreinum við Háskóla Íslands
signs of conflict in their attitude towards
gender issues, in which women experi-
enced to a lesser extent than men respect,
recognition and equality of treatment
within their respective departments. This
finding may indicate that the identifica-
tion of the women with the dominant cul-
ture in their respective departments was
not totally successful. The results have im-
plications for equality policy and practices
within the university and can be useful
for the respective departments in creating
programmes that attract women and men
more equally. They also have implications
for career counsellors and educators that
need to support and encourage women to
enter male-dominated fields.
Heimildaskrá
Andersen, M.L. (1997). Thinking about women:
Sociological perspectives on sex and gender (4.
útgáfa). Boston: Allyn og Bacon.
Andersen, M.L. og Hysock, D. (2009). Think-
ing about women: Sociological perspectives on
sex and gender (8. útgáfa). Boston: Allyn
and Bacon.
Anderson-Rowland, M.R. (2000). Underst-
anding engineering students for better
recruitment strategies: A four-year study.
Proceedings of 30th annual frontiers in educa-
tion conference, 1, (bls. 19–25). Washington:
IEEE Computer Society.
Auður Magndís Leiknisdóttir, Ásdís Aðal-
björg Arnalds og Friðrik H. Jónsson.
(2009). Staða og þróun jafnréttismála við Há-
skóla Íslands 2003–2007. Reykjavík: Félags-
vísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.
Betz, N.E. (2005). Womens career develop-
ment. Í S.D. Brown og R.W. Lent (rit-
stjórar), Career development and counseling:
Putting theory and research to work (bls.
253–279). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Betz, N. og Hackett, G. (1997). Applications
of self-efficacy theory to the career assess-
ment of women. Journal of Career Assess-
ment, 5, 383–402.
Blum, L. (2001). Women in computer science:
the carnegie mellon experience. Carnegie-
Mellon Sótt 29. nóvember 2009 af http://
www.cs.cmu.edu/~lblum/PAPERS/wo-
men_in_computer_science.pdf.
Booth, C. og Bennett, C. (2002). Gender
mainstreaming in the European Union.
Towards a new conception and practice of
equal opportunities? The European Journal
of Women’s Studies, 9(4), 430–444.
Cohoon, J.M. (2006). Just get over it or just get
on with it: Retaining women in undergra-
duate computing. Í J.M. Cohoon og W.
Aspray (ritstjórar), Women and information
technology: Research on underrepresentation
(bls. 205–238). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Coltrane, S. (1998). Gender and families. Calif-
ornia: Pine Forge Press.
Eccles, J.S. Barber, B. og Jozefowics, D. (1999).
Linking gender to educational, occupatio-
nal and recreational choices. Applying the
Eccles et.al. model of achivement-related
choices. Í W.B. Swann, jr., J.H. Langlois
og L.A. Gilbert (ritstjórar), Sexism and
sterotypes in modern society (bls. 153–192).
Washington: APA.
Erla Hulda Halldórsdóttir. (2004). Staða og
þróun jafnréttismála 1997–2002. Reykjavík:
Jafnréttisnefnd Háskóla Íslands.
Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question
in feminism: a view from feminist techno-
logy studies. Women´s Studies International
Forum 24(1), 79–96.