Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2001, Page 28

Jökull - 01.01.2001, Page 28
Knudsen et al. Figure 2) between 1992 and 1997. The bed eleva- tions of the eastern margin of the waning–stage jökul- hlaup fan (W) change from 80 m to 92–94 m during the same period. The greatest aggradation (16 m) oc- curred in the vicinity of the rising–stage fan (R), cre- ating the greatest potential of complete burial of ice blocks, as demonstrated by numerous kettle–holes in this region (Fay, in press). With this high aggradation, the two 1991 surge fans (B and C on Figure 2) were probably completely buried during the 1996 jökul- hlaup, although parts of these fans may have been eroded during the rising–stage of the flood. The apex of these fans in 1992 was at an elevation of 88 m, whilst the jökulhlaup fan elevations at the same loca- tions were 98–100 m in 1997. High sediment flux dur- ing the waning jökulhlaup flow stage may have buried the 1991 western surge fan (B). Localised backwa- ter conditions early in the rising flow stage, combined with high sediment flux within the flow, may have re- sulted in the burial of the eastern surge fan (C). The small sandur to the east of the rising–stage fan ag- graded from an elevation of 90 m in 1992 to 100 m in 1997. Transect 2 This transect shows cross-profile changes within one of the narrowest November 1996 proglacial channels. Major erosion of the island at the central part of this transect (distance 300-700 m, Figure 5) was ob- served during the rising flow stage on November 5th, 1996. This erosion resulted in marked lowering of the level of a large backwater lake which accumulated upstream during the early rising flow stage. The ero- sion concentrated mainly on the right bank where it amounted to 220 m. In contrast, erosion of the left bank was only 50 m (Figure 5). Such high erosion rates on the right bank could be due to the presence of relatively easily eroded fluvial and glacial sediments, as opposed to the buried glacier ice within the left bank. The area at the glacier margin (distance 0– 300 m, Figure 5) was over-washed during the jökul- hlaup. Therefore, some of the distinctive troughs may represent channels occupied by 1996 jökulhlaup wa- ter flowing obliquely around the island. The elevation of the main channel was 80 m in 1992 and 78 m in 1997. The region between transects 1 and 2 The proglacial lake Háöldulón (Figure 2) dominated this area in 1992. The lake was noticeably altered by the 1992 surge when the glacier advanced 200 m into it during a total advance of about 700 m in this region (Pálsson et al., 1992). The surge closed the former northwest outlet of Háöldulón resulting in the reacti- vation of an older and higher level outlet and about 2 m increase of the lake level (Figures 2 and 6). Tran- sect 2 crosses the outlet that was reactivated during the 1991 surge. The former area of Háöldulón has been com- pletely filled with sediments and is now occupied by the westernmost part of the waning–stage Gígjukvísl jökulhlaup fan (fan W in Figure 3). The former lake basin is now 80 m a.s.l. just upstream of transect 2 and 85–90 m a.s.l. at transect 2, whereas the lake level was 79 m a.s.l. in 1992. Transect 3 This transect shows a combination of erosion and de- position. Erosion of the right bank of the main chan- nel was 220 m, whilst erosion of the left bank was only 50 m. The pre-existing channel area aggraded by about 6 m. The northern bank of the island (dis- tance 500 m, Figure 5) was also eroded by jökulhlaup flows exiting the glacier from the north. These flows also resulted in the infill of a well–defined channel cut by 1991 surge–related flows exiting the ice margin. The irregular topography on the northern 300 m of this profile represents jökulhlaup deposition on top of the ice–marginal landscape created by meltout from the 1991 surge. The region between transects 2 and 3 This area is located downstream of lake Háöldulón and contains the largest fan formed during the 1991 surge (fan A). The three fans (A, B and C in Figure 2) indicate where bedload–rich flows escaped the glacier at the end of the surge. In 1992 the river flowed along the southern fringe of fan A and eroded the north side of Harðaskriða. The 1992 Gígjukvísl channel was braided from the fan to transect 4, but before the surge the channel was incised and sinuous (Figure 6). The pre–surge channel width at transect 2 was 50 m, but 28 JÖKULL No. 50
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.