Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Årgang

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1983, Side 64

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1983, Side 64
68 ÁRBÓK FORNLEIFAFÉLAGSINS SUMMARY This article presents a pollen analytical study made in connection with archaeological research at Herjólfsdalur in Heimaey, the biggest of the Westman Islands (off the south coast of Iceland). The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of the settle- ment on the vegetation, and as the soil profiles in Heimaey may be dated by tephro- chronological means, there is a possibility of relative dating. The dark part of the so- called settlement layer (Vlla), most probably deposited about A.D. 900, is found in Heimaey. Two soil profiles have been analysed and pollen diagrams drawn (fig. 3, tables II and III; for location see fig. 1). The profile named Herjólfsdalur situated some 100 m SSW from the excavatcd area contained badly corroded pollen grains. Assuming that the cor- rosion selectively acts upon various pollen types it makes all interpretation very difficult. At the present time there are no peatlands in Heimaey, but south of Herjólfsdalur the topographical name Torfmýri (Turf mire) still exists. Several sections at this site were examined, most of them showed a discontinuous tephra stratigraphy (see Torfmýri B fig. 2). No peat was seen and the sediment was similar to the one at Herjólfsdalur. A profile named Torfmýri A was analysed, however. The pollen preservation is somewhat better than at Herjólfsdalur but still too bad for any definite conclusions about the former vege- tation. The tephra layers K and tTl differ in chemical composition and a microscope examination of tephra layers VHa and tT2 showed a marked difference. For these reasons, bad pollen preservation and presumable hiatus in tephra stratigraphy, no attempt is made to compare those two pollen diagrams. The landnam phase in relative pollen diagrams from the lowland of Iceland is charac- terized by an abrupt rise of the Gramineae curve and a fall of the Betula curve. There are no indications of a Betula woodland in Heimaey, apparently the vegetation there al- ways has been low and open (grassland communities). If that is true, one can’t expect apophytes to react in the same way there as on the mainland. The appearance of pollen grains from assumed synanthrops is discussed and so is every indication of cereal culti- vation. All Gramineae pollen bigger than 40 /xm at Torfmýri were examined with Phase contrast, most of them having Hordeum sculpturing type, thus belonging to Elymus arenarius, Agropyron repens or Hordeum vulgare. The first maximum at L.P.A.Z. Tml is considered to occur because of Elymus, as there is further indication of strand vege- tation (Plantago maritima). The latter one at L.P.A.Z. Tm4 may be caused by some bar- ley cultivation, as we don’t have any simultaneous rise in any strandplant curve. In view of uncertainties in connection with the interpretation of the present data, it is considered wise to refrain as yet from any definite conclusions based on the pollen ana- lytical study.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.