Læknablaðið

Ukioqatigiit

Læknablaðið - 15.04.2007, Qupperneq 61

Læknablaðið - 15.04.2007, Qupperneq 61
ÞING SKURÐLÆKNA, SVÆFINGA- OG GJÖRGÆSLULÆKNA / ÁGRIP ERINDA kvarða. VAS <3 var metinn ásættanlegur árangur. Dreypihraði í ml/klst og notkun verkjalyfja var borin saman milli hópa. Niðurstöður Verkjastilling í hvíld/viö hreyfingu <50ára 51-70 ára >70 ára Fyrsti dagur. VAS<3 í hvíld 86% 93% 92% Fyrsti dagur. VAS<3 við hreyfingu 62% 66% 74% Annar dagur VAS<3 í hvíld 90% 95% 93% Annar dagur VAS<3 við hreyfingu 77% 81% 87% Dreypihraði á öðrum degi 8,3 ml/klst 8,0 ml/klst 7,25 ml/klst Notkun ópíatverkjalyfia 43% 29% 25% Notkun salýlyfja 48% 46% 30% Ályktun: Verkjastilling var betri, dreypihraði lægri og notkun sterkra verkjalyfja var minni í eldri aldurshópi en í öðrum hópum. Ofangreindar klínískar niðurstöður staðfesta því fyrri rannsóknir. " Simon MJG el al. Effecl ofage on llie clinical profile and systemic absorbtion and disposition of levobupivacaine after epidural administration. BJA 2004; 93:512-20. E-36 Klórgasslys á Eskifirði Hulda Bima Eiríksdóttirl, Björn Magnússonl, Guðjón Leifur Gunnarsson2, Hannes Sigmarssonl, Kristinn Tómasson3, Stefán Þórarinssonl huldaei@visir.is 'Heilbrigðisstofnun Austurlands, :Odense Universitets Hospital, 3Vinnu- eftirlit ríkisins Inngangur: Vegna mistaka við áfyllingu á klórtank í Sundlaug Eskifjarðar í júní 2006 losnaði töluvert magn af klórgasi út í andrúmsloftið og olli eitrun hjá starfsmönnum og sundlaugargestum. Einnig barst gasið yfir nærliggjandi leikvöll og leikskóla. Efniviður og aðferðir: Gerð var úttekt á slysinu og afleiðingum þess fyrir einstaklingana sem í því lentu. Niðurstöður: Alls leituðu 59 manns á heilsugæslu Eskifjarðar eftir slysið, 34 börn og 25 fullorðnir. Einkenni voru frá vægum særindum í hálsi og upp í andnauð. Samtals 36 sjúklingar voru fluttir á Fjórðungssjúkrahúsið á Neskaupsstað. Tveir þeirra voru fluttir áfram til FSA á gjörgæslu en fjórir á Landspítala á almennar legudeildir. Björgunaraðgerðir voru með þeim stærri sem settar hafa verið í gang á landinu. Strax í upphafi var Samhæfingarstöð Almannavarna virkjuð. Björgunarviðbragðið krafðist samvinnu margra aðila af öllu landinu. Almenningur veitti mikilvæga hjálp. Áætlað er að 200-300 manns hafi komið að aðgerðum með einum eða öðrum hætti. Ályktun: Umfangsmiklar björgunaraðgerðir voru settar í gang, bæði í héraði og á landsvísu og reyndi á skipulag almannavarna. Meirihluti þeirra sem fyrir eitruninni varð jafnaði sig skjótt og enginn lést. E-37 Radiological behaviour of a cervical interbody fusion cage (BAK/C). A randomized clinical study using radioste- reometry (RSA) Björn Zoéga', Bengt Lind2 bjornz@landspitali.is ‘Landspítali, Reykjavík, Iceland, 2Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden Introduction: To avoid graft collapse with subsequent subsi- dence and malalignment of a fused segment in cervical spine degenerative surgery, the use of fusion cages has increased over the last years. No randomized studies exist that demonst- rate the difference between the two methods in terms of graft subsidence and angulation of the fused segment.The aim of this study was to study subsidence and angulation that occurs after a single-level discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with autograft or a threaded fusion cage (BAK/C). Material and methods: A randomized clinical study using radiostereometry (RSA) with a 2-years follow-up was performed. The size of the study population was calculated to be 24 patients to reach a significant difference at the 95% CI level. Consecutive patients with one-level cervical radiculopathy scheduled for surgery were randomized to ACDF with autograft or to fusion cage. Tantalum markers were inserted in both adjacent vertebrae at the end of surgery. Radiostereometry was performed immediately postoperatively and at regular intervals for 2 years. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the clinical outcome and an unbiased observer graded the outcome after 2 years. Results: No significant differences was found between the two methods after 2 years in regard of narrowing of the disc space (mean: 1.7 and 1.4 mm respectively) or deformation of the fused segment into flexion (mean: 7.7° and 4.6° respectively). Patients in the cage group had a significantly better outcome in terms of reduction of both arm and neck pain and in Odom’s score. Discussion: The findings of subsidence and flexion deformation of the fused segment after 2 years seem to be of no clinical importance after one level cervical disc surgery. However, in multi-level surgery using the same methods, an additive effect of the deformations of the fused segments may affect the clinical outcome. E-38 Bone-metal stability of the Bryan disc prosthesis, a RadioStereometric 2 year Analysis Björn Zoega1. Bengt Lind2 bjornz@landspitali.is ‘Landspítali, Reykjavík, Iceland, 2Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göte- borg, Sweden Introduction: The effect of usion on adjacent discs in cervical spine surgery has been postulated to lead to increased stress, increased motion and increased degeneration on radiography on adjacent discs. In the early era of artificial disc prosthesis Fernström balls did not preserve motion but created fusion in the lumbar spine. The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis uses a de- Læknablaðið 2007/93 3 25
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120

x

Læknablaðið

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.