Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2014, Page 57

Jökull - 01.01.2014, Page 57
Magnetostratigraphy, K-AR dating and erosion history of Hafrafell, SE–Iceland glacial intervals, may reflect that Hafrafell was cen- trally located at this time with regard to an ice sheet. In this case it may be that erosion in Hafrafell out- weighed accumulation that lead to greater erosion and excess relief there during the Gauss chron. The greater erosion in Hafrafell may even have obliterated the ev- idence of at least 3 Gauss glacials that are present in the Fljótsdalur area relatively close by. The Hafrafell dike swarm, age and possible source. The Hafrafell stratigraphy and lava-dike relations do provide some information on the dike swarm age and source. Thus, we find the most likely source to be an old volcano that was active some 2 Ma and had a location near the Hrútfjöll area or in that direction with regard to Hafrafell. The dikes cut the top of Neðri-Menn, a lava sequence of Matuyama age. Be- low Neðri Menn, at 390 m a.s.l., we dated a lava flow at 2.35 Ma that therefore must be maximum age for the dike swarm. The swarm does not cut through the "Hafrafell valley strata", that are slightly older than Olduvai or 1.85 Ma. Most probably, the swarm was active at about 2 Ma or in the interval 1.85 to 2.35 Ma. The swarm trends into the Hrútfjöll lower sequence and the Hafrafell strata show "southward" building of lenses. The source for both the Hafrafell strata and dike swarm could therefore be in the general Hrútfjöll area. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The lowest strata in Hafrafell are lava flows that we correlate with the base of the Gilbert chron (C2Ar or 3.596–4.187 Ma), erupted at about 4 Ma. Upwards the lavas accumulated slowly during the Gilbert (C2Ar; 155-m-thick) and Gauss (C2An; 234-m-thick) mag- netic chrons or during the interval 4.187–2.581 Ma. Dating and stratigraphic correlation suggests that during Gauss time strata accumulated only during early Gauss (C2An.3n or 3.330–3.596 Ma). There- fore, slow accumulation rates or more likely inten- sive erosion lasted through the onset of Matuyama chron (2.581–0.781 Ma) when a 739-m-thick se- quence formed, predominantly of lavas. We attribute slower accumulation rates in the Hafrafell lower sequence in part to its rift flank lo- cation, to the east of the axial rift zone. The Hafrafell lower strata accumulated through forward stacking of lenses that were added toward south or distally, as op- posed to centrally constructed crust in the accreting rift zones. Twelve erosion surfaces, HR1 to HR12, are identified, based on tillite occurrences, subglacially erupted pillow basalts and glacially striated lava sur- faces. We divide the erosion and landscape evolution of Hafrafell into 6 stages. During the first two stages (late Neogene) volcanism was continuous but accu- mulation rates were slow and topographic relief was less than 100 m. During stage 3, i.e. lower Matuyama time, lava production increased and accumulation ex- ceeded erosion. In stage 4, during upper Matuyama time, the Hafrafell valley formed and a valley net- work may have characterized the landscape. Stage 5, in upper Matuyama time, marked the filling up of the Hafrafell valley with lava flows and subglacial vol- canics and evening out the established valleys. Dur- ing stage 6, or the Brunhes chron, major subglacial volcanism took place with continuous erosion within ∼2-km-deep valley network. Acknowledgements The people of Freysnes and Svínafell in Öræfi are thanked for continued support over the years. We gratefully acknowledge the generous use of Leó Kristjánsson’s laboratory, Institute of Earth Science, University of Iceland, for paleomagnetic measure- ments. Friends of Vatnajökull, a non-profit asso- ciation of the Vatnajökull national park, is thanked for financial assistance to J.H. We thank Morten Ri- ishus for many thought provoking comments on the manuscript. Critical review by David McGarvie on the manuscript led to significant improvements. An early part of this work was supported to J.H. by the Iceland Science Fund. ÁGRIP Jökulrof umhverfis eldstöðina í Öræfajökli, SA-landi, hefur grafið yfir 2 km djúpa dali. Þar, í Hafrafelli, bendir samsetning um 2.8 km þykks jarðlagasniðs til þess að landslag hafi þróast frá frekar flötu landi til mishæða og að lokum dalakerfa. Með kortlagningu JÖKULL No. 64, 2014 57
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.