Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2014, Side 57

Jökull - 01.01.2014, Side 57
Magnetostratigraphy, K-AR dating and erosion history of Hafrafell, SE–Iceland glacial intervals, may reflect that Hafrafell was cen- trally located at this time with regard to an ice sheet. In this case it may be that erosion in Hafrafell out- weighed accumulation that lead to greater erosion and excess relief there during the Gauss chron. The greater erosion in Hafrafell may even have obliterated the ev- idence of at least 3 Gauss glacials that are present in the Fljótsdalur area relatively close by. The Hafrafell dike swarm, age and possible source. The Hafrafell stratigraphy and lava-dike relations do provide some information on the dike swarm age and source. Thus, we find the most likely source to be an old volcano that was active some 2 Ma and had a location near the Hrútfjöll area or in that direction with regard to Hafrafell. The dikes cut the top of Neðri-Menn, a lava sequence of Matuyama age. Be- low Neðri Menn, at 390 m a.s.l., we dated a lava flow at 2.35 Ma that therefore must be maximum age for the dike swarm. The swarm does not cut through the "Hafrafell valley strata", that are slightly older than Olduvai or 1.85 Ma. Most probably, the swarm was active at about 2 Ma or in the interval 1.85 to 2.35 Ma. The swarm trends into the Hrútfjöll lower sequence and the Hafrafell strata show "southward" building of lenses. The source for both the Hafrafell strata and dike swarm could therefore be in the general Hrútfjöll area. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The lowest strata in Hafrafell are lava flows that we correlate with the base of the Gilbert chron (C2Ar or 3.596–4.187 Ma), erupted at about 4 Ma. Upwards the lavas accumulated slowly during the Gilbert (C2Ar; 155-m-thick) and Gauss (C2An; 234-m-thick) mag- netic chrons or during the interval 4.187–2.581 Ma. Dating and stratigraphic correlation suggests that during Gauss time strata accumulated only during early Gauss (C2An.3n or 3.330–3.596 Ma). There- fore, slow accumulation rates or more likely inten- sive erosion lasted through the onset of Matuyama chron (2.581–0.781 Ma) when a 739-m-thick se- quence formed, predominantly of lavas. We attribute slower accumulation rates in the Hafrafell lower sequence in part to its rift flank lo- cation, to the east of the axial rift zone. The Hafrafell lower strata accumulated through forward stacking of lenses that were added toward south or distally, as op- posed to centrally constructed crust in the accreting rift zones. Twelve erosion surfaces, HR1 to HR12, are identified, based on tillite occurrences, subglacially erupted pillow basalts and glacially striated lava sur- faces. We divide the erosion and landscape evolution of Hafrafell into 6 stages. During the first two stages (late Neogene) volcanism was continuous but accu- mulation rates were slow and topographic relief was less than 100 m. During stage 3, i.e. lower Matuyama time, lava production increased and accumulation ex- ceeded erosion. In stage 4, during upper Matuyama time, the Hafrafell valley formed and a valley net- work may have characterized the landscape. Stage 5, in upper Matuyama time, marked the filling up of the Hafrafell valley with lava flows and subglacial vol- canics and evening out the established valleys. Dur- ing stage 6, or the Brunhes chron, major subglacial volcanism took place with continuous erosion within ∼2-km-deep valley network. Acknowledgements The people of Freysnes and Svínafell in Öræfi are thanked for continued support over the years. We gratefully acknowledge the generous use of Leó Kristjánsson’s laboratory, Institute of Earth Science, University of Iceland, for paleomagnetic measure- ments. Friends of Vatnajökull, a non-profit asso- ciation of the Vatnajökull national park, is thanked for financial assistance to J.H. We thank Morten Ri- ishus for many thought provoking comments on the manuscript. Critical review by David McGarvie on the manuscript led to significant improvements. An early part of this work was supported to J.H. by the Iceland Science Fund. ÁGRIP Jökulrof umhverfis eldstöðina í Öræfajökli, SA-landi, hefur grafið yfir 2 km djúpa dali. Þar, í Hafrafelli, bendir samsetning um 2.8 km þykks jarðlagasniðs til þess að landslag hafi þróast frá frekar flötu landi til mishæða og að lokum dalakerfa. Með kortlagningu JÖKULL No. 64, 2014 57
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.