Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.1994, Síða 132

13 0 Kristján A rnason
—. 1985. Icelandic Word Stress and Metrical Phonology. Studia Linguistica 39:93-
129.
—. 1987. The Stress of Prefixes and Suffixes in Icelandic. Kirsten Gregersen og
Hans Basb0ll (ritstj.). Nordic ProsodylV, bls. 137-146. Odense University Press,
Odense.
—. 1994. Um tónfall í afmæliskveðjum og öðrum kveðjum. Jónína hans Jóns G.
Friðjónssonarfimmtugs, 24. ágúst 1994, bls. 84-91. (Umsjón: Guðrún Kvaran,
Jörgen Pind, Margrét Jónsdóttir og Svavar Sigmundsson.) Reykjavík.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1992. An Introduction to Intonational Phonology. Gerard J. Docherty
og D. RobertLadd, (ritstj.): Papers in Laboratory Phonology 11: Gesture, Segment,
Prosody., bls. 321-334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Magnús Pétursson. 1978. Intonationen i den enkle deklarative sætning i islandsk. Eva
Gárding, Gösta Bruce og Robert Bannert (ritstj.): Nordic Prosody: Papersfrom a
Symposium, bls. 33-41. Málvísindadeild Lundarháskóla, Lundi.
Magnús Pétursson, 1979. Nokkur hljómfallsform sem gefa til kynna þagnir í íslensku.
íslenskt mál og almenn málfrœði 1:208-19.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonetics and Phonology of English Intonation.
Doktorsritgerð, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet og Julia Hirschberg. 1990. The Meaning of Intonational Contours
in the Interpretation of Discourse. Cohen, Philip R., Jerry Morgan og Martha E.
Pollack (ritstj.): Intentions in Communication, bls. 271-311. The MIT Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sigurður Kristófer Pétursson. 1924. Hrynjandi íslenzkrartungu. Steindór Gunnarsson,
Reykjavík.
S veinn Bergsveinsson. 1941. Grundfragen der islandischen Satzphonetik. Ejnar Munks-
gaard, Kaupmannahöfn; Metten, Berlín.
SUMMARY
This article subits some basic observations toward the analysis of Icelandic into-
nation within the framework of the autosegmental/metrical tradition in intonational
phonology (see e.g. Pierrehumbert 1980 and Ladd 1992). Section 2 contains a discus-
sion of sentence stress and the rhythmic organisation of utterances. It is shown that
the basic rule is for sentence stress to be final, whereas word stress is initial. Thus
„other things being equal“ the nuclear syllable is the stressed syllable of the rightmost
word in an utterance. But other factors, such as differences in the „strength" of some
morphological classes, focus structure and other contextual phenomena may affect the
pattern of sentence stress. In Section 3 there is a description of the pitch accents, and in
Section 4 an account is given of the boundary tones and their interplay with the pitch
accents. The most important tonal units are: a HL pitch accent, a LH pitch accent and
two boundary tones, a H and a L. All combinations of these tones are shown to occur
toward the end of utterances: