Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 109

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 109
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 114 115 to an unlawful arrest but applies to other measures as well that are described in chapters IX-XIV of the Criminal Procedures Act, for example the use of wiretaps and other similar electronic surveillance measures. It is quite clear from assessing the case law from the district courts and the Supreme Court that claims regarding violations on the right to protest are generally based on both Article 246 para 3 and Article 26. There was a case in 2009 regarding a violation of the right to protest where claims for compensations were only made on the grounds of Article 246 para 325 but this is the exception, claims are generally made in these cases on the grounds of both provisions.26 An example of this is the Supreme Court judgements in Hrd. 65-70/1999, were eight individuals claimed that their constitutional right to expression guaranteed in Article 73 of the Constitution had been violated when they were arrested while they were protesting and furthermore detained in the police station for three hours. They based their claim for compensations on Article 246 of Act No. 88/2008 and Article 26 of Act No. 50/1993. The Court found that these arrests had been unlawful, and they received compensation for non-pecuniary damage. It was the Supreme Courts assessment that the first condition in Article 73 paragraph 3 which states that the restrictions need to be prescribed by law was not fulfilled. 3 What is the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the right to protest in your country? The human rights chapter of the Constitution of Iceland was revised in the year 1995 with the aim to modernize the human rights provisions and update it in accordance with international obligations that the Icelandic state had undertaken with participation in various international agreements.27 One of those agreements was the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which was enacted as law in Iceland on the 19th of May 1994, as Act No. 62/1994. In the explanatory report on the parliamentary bill on the Act it was stated that the human rights provisions, as they were before the revision in 1995, had become obsolete. Even though the enactment of the Convention would not change their meaning, it would result in a broader interpretation of the rights in accordance with the Convention. In the report it also said that the Constitution would have to be revised, especially in regard to the ECHR.28 Thus when the Constitution of Iceland was revised in 1995, regard was taken to the ECHR. It is also apparent 25 E-6474/2009. 26 Hrd. 802/2014; Hrd. 65-70/1999; E-2924/2013; E-1441/2013; E-4007/2008. 27 Björg Thorarensen, Stjórnskipunarréttur. Mannréttindi (Codex 2008) 106. 28 Alþt. 1992-1993, A-deild, p. 5892. 2 Does the national legal system provide an effective remedy to individuals who claim that their right to protest has been violated? The Icelandic legal system does provide effective remedies to individuals who claim that their right to protest has been violated. If an individual feels that his right to protest was restricted in an unlawful manner or his right has in other regards been violated, he can bring a case before the appropriate district court and make a claim for punitive damages on the grounds of Article 26 of the Tort Act No. 50/1993 (ICE). If the restriction in question also regards an unlawful arrest, as many of them do, then compensations can further be based on Article 246 para 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act No. 88/2008 (ICE). The Article states that a person has the right to compensations if that person has suffered a loss as a result of measures described in chapters IX-XIV of the Act.21 As illustrated in the answer to the first question, the right to protest is guaranteed in the Constitution, on the grounds of two separate provisions, Article 73 para 2, that guarantees the freedom of expression and Article 74 para 3, which protects the right to peaceful assembly. Furthermore, that the right to protest is not without limitations and that certain conditions need to be fulfilled in order for a restriction on this right to be justified. If the freedom of expression is to be limited, then the conditions specified in Article 73 para 3 need to be met. According to that provision restrictions need to be prescribed by law, in the interest of one of the aims specified in the provision and the restrictions need to be necessary in a democratic society. All of these three conditions need to be fulfilled.22 The right to peaceful assembly can likewise be restricted and public gatherings in the open may be banned if there is a threat of riots. In addition to these similar conditions as the ones that pertain to the limitations on freedom of expression have been applied on the grounds of Article 11 para 2 of the Convention23. This means that if the limitation in question meets all of these conditions, then there has not been a violation on the right to protest and the individual will have to tolerate the restriction and does not have the right to get compensations. The vast majority of cases concerning the right to protest involve an unlawful arrest and that is the reasons for claims being made on the grounds of Article 246 para 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act in addition to Article 26 of the Tort Act.24 It is important to bear in mind that Article 246 para 3 is not restricted 21 Chapter XIII regardes Arrests. 22 Schram, 581, 601. 23 According to that provision no restrictions shall be made on the exercise of the right of peaceful assembly other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society. They furthermore need to bee in the interests of national security or public safety. When assessing weather or not an interference with the right to protest is justified the Supreme Court of Iceland has applied these conditions as is evident from its jurisprudence; Hrd. 65-70/1999; Hrd. 812-820/2014. 24 Hrd. 802/2014; Hrd. 65-70/1999; E-2924/2013; E-1441/2013; E-4007/2008. International Legal Research Group
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216
Side 217
Side 218
Side 219
Side 220
Side 221
Side 222
Side 223
Side 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.